Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon graft with different repair techniques and graft surface modification

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of modified repair techniques for flexor tendon reconstruction and the effects of surface modification using carbodiimide‐derivatized synovial fluid plus gelatin (cd‐SF‐G), compared to the traditional repair technique...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic research Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 731 - 737
Main Authors: Wu, Jingheng, Thoreson, Andrew R., Reisdorf, Ramona L., An, Kai-Nan, Moran, Steven L., Amadio, Peter C., Zhao, Chunfeng
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-05-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of modified repair techniques for flexor tendon reconstruction and the effects of surface modification using carbodiimide‐derivatized synovial fluid plus gelatin (cd‐SF‐G), compared to the traditional repair techniques. The second and fifth digits from 16 canine forepaws were randomly divided into 4 groups: (1) traditional graft repairs (TGR group) including distal Bunnell repair and proximal Pulvertaft weave repair; (2) modified graft repairs (MGR group) including distal graft bony attachment repair and proximal step‐cut repair; (3) group TGR coated with cd‐SF‐G (TGR‐C group); and (4) group MGR coated with cd‐SF‐G (MGR‐C group). Digit normalized work of flexion (nWOF), ultimate failure strength, and stiffness were measured. The nWOF in MGR group was significantly less than TGR group (p < 0.05). The nWOF in groups treated with cd‐SF‐G was significantly less than their untreated counterparts (p < 0.05). Ultimate load to failure of the MGR‐C group was significantly greater than the TGR‐C group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in stiffness was found between these two groups. The modified techniques cannot only improve tendon gliding abilities but can also improve breaking strength. Additionally, surface modification with cd‐SF‐G significantly decreased the work of flexion. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:731–737, 2015.
Bibliography:istex:CAAE1AFD608B2D7BBB73AAE9D6D1F2E87D9601C2
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-4K16D5GH-P
NIH/NIAMS - No. AR57745
ArticleID:JOR22844
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.22844