How constraints affect the hunter’s decision to shoot a deer

Hunting is the predominant way of controlling many wildlife populations devoid of large carnivores. It subjects animals to mortality rates that far exceed natural rates and that differ markedly in which age, sex, or size classes are removed relative to those of natural predators. To explain the emer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 50; pp. 14450 - 14455
Main Authors: Diekert, Florian K., Richter, Andries, Rivrud, Inger Maren, Mysterud, Atle
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 13-12-2016
Series:From the Cover
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hunting is the predominant way of controlling many wildlife populations devoid of large carnivores. It subjects animals to mortality rates that far exceed natural rates and that differ markedly in which age, sex, or size classes are removed relative to those of natural predators. To explain the emerging selection pattern we develop behavioral microfoundations for a hunting model, emphasizing in particular the constraints given by the formal and informal norms, rules, and regulations that govern the hunter’s choice. We show how a shorter remaining season, competition among hunters, lower sighting probabilities, and higher costs all lead to lower reservation values, i.e., an increased likelihood of shooting a particular animal. Using a unique dataset on seen and shot deer from Norway, we test and confirm the theoretical predictions in a recreational and meat-motivated hunting system. To achieve sustainability, future wildlife management should account for this predictable selection pressure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by William C. Clark, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved October 12, 2016 (received for review May 13, 2016)
Author contributions: F.K.D. designed research; F.K.D., A.R., and I.M.R. performed research; F.K.D., A.R., and I.M.R. analyzed data; and F.K.D., A.R., I.M.R., and A.M. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1607685113