An assessment of the utility of the yeast GreenScreen assay in pharmaceutical screening

In this paper we describe an initial reproducibility study of 12 proprietary compounds followed by the assessment of 51 marketed pharmaceuticals and, lastly, a summary of the data so far from 2698 proprietary compounds from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) compound library, in the yeast GreenScre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mutagenesis Vol. 20; no. 6; pp. 449 - 454
Main Authors: Van Gompel, J., Woestenborghs, F., Beerens, D., Mackie, C., Cahill, P.A., Knight, A.W., Billinton, N., Tweats, D.J., Walmsley, R.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-11-2005
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper we describe an initial reproducibility study of 12 proprietary compounds followed by the assessment of 51 marketed pharmaceuticals and, lastly, a summary of the data so far from 2698 proprietary compounds from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) compound library, in the yeast GreenScreen® assay (GSA). In this assay, a reporter system in the yeast cells employs the DNA damage inducible promoter of the RAD54 gene, fused to the extremely stable green fluorescent protein (GFP). The assay proved to be very robust, the Excel templates provided by Gentronix with the assay interfaced well with in-house J&J systems with little adaptation, the assay was very rapid to perform and used very little compound. The results confirm previous work which suggests that the yeast GSA detects different classes of genotoxic compounds to the Ames assay and as a result can help screen out important genotoxic compounds at the pre-regulatory test phase that are missed by Ames-test-based screens alone. A combination of SAR evaluation of genotoxicity plus an Ames-test-based screen and the GSA provides a powerful pre-regulatory test battery to aid in the selection of successful drug candidates.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-FHRVJLCN-7
local:gei062
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 161 306 4174; Fax: +44 161 236 0409; Email: richard.walmsley@manchester.ac.uk
istex:8612E1CB0118D058E57C56A075D914ED7FC97B05
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0267-8357
1464-3804
DOI:10.1093/mutage/gei062