Effects and distribution of the enamel matrix derivative Emdogain® in the periodontal tissues of rat molars transplanted to the abdominal wall

• Published in: Dental traumatology Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 12 - 23
• Main Authors: Hamamoto, Yoshioki, Kawasaki, Naoko, Jarnbring, Fredrik, Hammarström, Lars
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copenhagen Munksgaard International Publishers 01-02-2002
• Subjects: Abdomen; alveolar bone; Amelogenin; Animals; Dental Enamel Proteins - biosynthesis; Dental Enamel Proteins - pharmacokinetics; Dental Enamel Proteins - pharmacology; Dental Enamel Proteins - therapeutic use; Dentistry; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Molar; periodontal regeneration; Periodontium - drug effects; Periodontium - physiology; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Regeneration - drug effects; root resorption; Root Resorption - drug therapy; Tooth - transplantation; Tooth Root - metabolism
• ISSN: 1600-4469; 1600-9657
• DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180102.x

– The enamel matrix derivative Emdogain® (EMD) has been found to promote regeneration of lost periodontal tissues. We have studied the effects and distribution of EMD in the periodontal tissues of maxillary rat molars transplanted to a subcutaneous position in the abdominal wall. The molars were transplanted with or without EMD either immediately after extraction or after drying for 30 min. After 2 days, 1, 2 or 4 weeks the rats were killed and the teeth were examined by means of light microscopy and immunohistochemistry with anti‐amelogenin antibodies. Teeth transplanted immediately after extraction showed formation of alveolar bone separated from the dental roots by a periodontal space, regardless of the use of EMD. Among the teeth that were transplanted with EMD after drying for 30 min, new alveolar bone was formed in five out of eight teeth after 2 and 4 weeks. None of the teeth that were dried for 30 min and transplanted without EMD showed alveolar bone formation. Only one tooth transplanted with EMD showed root resorption after drying, while resorption was noted in all teeth transplanted without EMD. All teeth that were transplanted with EMD and none of the teeth that were transplanted without EMD showed an immunohistochemical reaction for amelogenin. After 2 days, amelogenin was precipitated on all surfaces exposed at the transplantation procedure. Later, the immunoreactive material was redistributed to cells at the root surface, where it was still demonstrable after 4 weeks. In conclusion, EMD is accumulated in cells at the root surface and promotes regeneration of the periodontal tissues of the transplanted teeth. It also seems to promote healing of root resorption.