The anatomic basis of the right face-selective N170 IN acquired prosopagnosia: A combined ERP/fMRI study
► The N170 ERP component is larger for face stimuli compared to objects. ► We assessed the face-selectivity of the N170 in five patients with prosopagnosia. ► Neither anterior temporal, nor FFA lesions, affected face-selectivity of the N170. ► Face-selectivity was absent in two patients with lesions...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuropsychologia Vol. 49; no. 9; pp. 2553 - 2563 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01-07-2011
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► The N170 ERP component is larger for face stimuli compared to objects. ► We assessed the face-selectivity of the N170 in five patients with prosopagnosia. ► Neither anterior temporal, nor FFA lesions, affected face-selectivity of the N170. ► Face-selectivity was absent in two patients with lesions to the OFA and FFA. ► We conclude that the N170 requires at least two parts of the core face network.
The N170 waveform is larger over posterior temporal cortex when healthy subjects view faces than when they view other objects. Source analyses have produced mixed results regarding whether this effect originates in the fusiform face area (FFA), lateral occipital cortex, or superior temporal sulcus (STS), components of the core face network. In a complementary approach, we assessed the face-selectivity of the right N170 in five patients with acquired prosopagnosia, who also underwent structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. We used a non-parametric bootstrap procedure to perform single-subject analyses, which reliably confirmed N170 face-selectivity in each of 10 control subjects. Anterior temporal lesions that spared the core face network did not affect the face-selectivity of the N170. A face-selective N170 was also present in another subject who had lost only the right FFA. However, face-selectivity was absent in two patients with lesions that eliminated the occipital face area (OFA) and FFA, sparing only the STS. Thus while the right FFA is not necessary for the face-selectivity of the N170, neither is the STS sufficient. We conclude that the face-selective N170 in prosopagnosia requires residual function of at least two components of the core face-processing network. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.003 |