Efficacy and safety of Velmanase alfa in the treatment of patients with alpha-mannosidosis: results from the core and extension phase analysis of a phase III multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Introduction This phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (and extension phase) was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of velmanase alfa (VA) in alpha-mannosidosis (AM) patients. Methods Twenty-five patients were randomised to weekly 1 mg/kg VA or placebo for 52 weeks....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of inherited metabolic disease Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 1215 - 1223
Main Authors: Borgwardt, Line, Guffon, Nathalie, Amraoui, Yasmina, Dali, Christine I., De Meirleir, Linda, Gil-Campos, Mercedes, Heron, Bénédicte, Geraci, Silvia, Ardigò, Diego, Cattaneo, Federica, Fogh, Jens, Van den Hout, J. M. Hannerieke, Beck, Michael, Jones, Simon A., Tylki-Szymanska, Anna, Haugsted, Ulla, Lund, Allan M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-12-2018
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction This phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (and extension phase) was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of velmanase alfa (VA) in alpha-mannosidosis (AM) patients. Methods Twenty-five patients were randomised to weekly 1 mg/kg VA or placebo for 52 weeks. At study conclusion, placebo patients switched to VA; 23 patients continued receiving VA in compassionate-use/follow-on studies and were evaluated in the extension phase [last observation (LO)]. Co-primary endpoints were changes in serum oligosaccharide (S-oligo) and in the 3-min stair-climb test (3MSCT). Results Mean relative change in S-oligo in the VA arm was −77.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) −81.6 to −72.8] at week 52 and −62.9% (95% CI −85.8 to −40.0) at LO; mean relative change in the placebo arm was −24.1% (95% CI −40.3 to −3.6) at week 52 and −55.7% (95% CI −76.4 to −34.9) at LO after switch to active treatment. Mean relative change in 3MSCT at week 52 was −1.1% (95% CI −9.0 to 7.6) and − % (95% CI −13.4 to 6.5) for VA and placebo, respectively. At LO, the mean relative change was 3.9% (95% CI −5.5 to 13.2) in the VA arm and 9.0% (95% CI −10.3 to 28.3) in placebo patients after switch to active treatment. Similar improvement pattern was observed in secondary parameters. A post hoc analysis investigated whether some factors at baseline could account for treatment outcome; none of those factors were predictive of the response to VA, besides age. Conclusions These findings support the utility of VA for the treatment of AM, with more evident benefit over time and when treatment is started in the paediatric age.
Bibliography:Communicated by: Carla E. Hollak
The online version of this article (10.1007/s10545‐018‐0185‐0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Electronic supplementary material
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0141-8955
1573-2665
DOI:10.1007/s10545-018-0185-0