Barriers to healthcare: Instrument development and comparison between autistic adults and adults with and without other disabilities

Our objective was to use a community-based participatory research approach to identify and compare barriers to healthcare experienced by autistic adults and adults with and without other disabilities. To do so, we developed a Long- and Short-Form instrument to assess barriers in clinical and researc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Autism : the international journal of research and practice Vol. 21; no. 8; pp. 972 - 984
Main Authors: Raymaker, Dora M, McDonald, Katherine E, Ashkenazy, Elesia, Gerrity, Martha, Baggs, Amelia M, Kripke, Clarissa, Hourston, Sarah, Nicolaidis, Christina
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-11-2017
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Our objective was to use a community-based participatory research approach to identify and compare barriers to healthcare experienced by autistic adults and adults with and without other disabilities. To do so, we developed a Long- and Short-Form instrument to assess barriers in clinical and research settings. Using the Barriers to Healthcare Checklist–Long Form, we surveyed 437 participants (209 autistic, 55 non-autistic with disabilities, and 173 non-autistic without disabilities). Autistic participants selected different and greater barriers to healthcare, particularly in areas related to emotional regulation, patient-provider communication, sensory sensitivity, and healthcare navigation. Top barriers were fear or anxiety (35% (n = 74)), not being able to process information fast enough to participate in real-time discussions about healthcare (32% (n = 67)), concern about cost (30% (n = 62)), facilities causing sensory issues 30% ((n = 62)), and difficulty communicating with providers (29% (n = 61)). The Long Form instrument exhibited good content and construct validity. The items combined to create the Short Form had predominantly high levels of correlation (range 0.2–0.8, p < 0.001) and showed responsiveness to change. We recommend healthcare providers, clinics, and others working in healthcare settings to be aware of these barriers, and urge more intervention research to explore means for removing them.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-2
ISSN:1362-3613
1461-7005
DOI:10.1177/1362361316661261