Improved non-invasive positron emission tomographic imaging of chemotherapy-induced tumor cell death using Zirconium-89-labeled APOMAB

Purpose The chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) chDAB4 (APOMAB®) targets the Lupus associated (La)/Sjögren Syndrome-B (SSB) antigen, which is over-expressed in tumors but only becomes available for antibody binding in dead tumor cells. Hence, chDAB4 may be used as a novel theranostic tool to distingu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 27
Main Authors: Liapis, Vasilios, Tieu, William, Rudd, Stacey E., Donnelly, Paul S., Wittwer, Nicole L., Brown, Michael P., Staudacher, Alexander H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 17-11-2020
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) chDAB4 (APOMAB®) targets the Lupus associated (La)/Sjögren Syndrome-B (SSB) antigen, which is over-expressed in tumors but only becomes available for antibody binding in dead tumor cells. Hence, chDAB4 may be used as a novel theranostic tool to distinguish between responders and nonresponders early after chemotherapy. Here, we aimed to ascertain which positron emitter, Zirconium-89 ([ 89 Zr]Zr IV ) or Iodine-124 ([ 124 I]I), was best suited to label chDAB4 for post-chemotherapy PET imaging of tumor-bearing mice and to determine which of two different bifunctional chelators provided optimal tumor imaging by PET using [ 89 Zr]Zr IV -labeled chDAB4. Methods C57BL/6 J mice bearing subcutaneous syngeneic tumors of EL4 lymphoma were either untreated or given chemotherapy, then administered radiolabeled chDAB4 after 24 h with its biodistribution examined using PET and organ assay. We compared chDAB4 radiolabeled with [ 89 Zr] Zr IV or [ 124 I] I, or [ 89 Zr]Zr-chDAB4 using either DFO-NCS or DFOSq as a chelator. Results After chemotherapy, [ 89 Zr]Zr-chDAB4 showed higher and prolonged mean (± SD) tumor uptake of 29.5 ± 5.9 compared to 7.8 ± 1.2 for [ 124 I] I -chDAB4. In contrast, antibody uptake in healthy tissues was not affected. Compared to DFO-NCS, DFOSq did not result in significant differences in tumor uptake of [ 89 Zr]Zr-chDAB4 but did alter the tumor:liver ratio in treated mice 3 days after injection in favour of DFOSq (8.0 ± 1.1) compared to DFO-NCS (4.2 ± 0.7). Conclusion ImmunoPET using chDAB4 radiolabeled with residualizing [ 89 Zr] Zr IV rather than [ 124 I] I optimized post-chemotherapy tumor uptake. Further, PET imaging characteristics were improved by DFOSq rather than DFO-NCS. Therefore, the radionuclide/chelator combination of [ 89 Zr] Zr IV and DFOSq is preferred for the imminent clinical evaluation of chDAB4 as a selective tumor cell death radioligand.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2365-421X
2365-421X
DOI:10.1186/s41181-020-00109-6