Instability in pipe flow

The long-puzzling, unphysical result that linear stability analyses lead to no transition in pipe flow, even at infinite Reynolds number, is ascribed to the use of stick boundary conditions, because they ignore the amplitude variations associated with the roughness of the wall. Once that length scal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 105; no. 2; pp. 428 - 430
Main Authors: Cotrell, D.L, McFadden, G.B, Alder, B.J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 15-01-2008
National Acad Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The long-puzzling, unphysical result that linear stability analyses lead to no transition in pipe flow, even at infinite Reynolds number, is ascribed to the use of stick boundary conditions, because they ignore the amplitude variations associated with the roughness of the wall. Once that length scale is introduced (here, crudely, through a corrugated pipe), linear stability analyses lead to stable vortex formation at low Reynolds number above a finite amplitude of the corrugation and unsteady flow at a higher Reynolds number, where indications are that the vortex dislodges. Remarkably, extrapolation to infinite Reynolds number of both of these transitions leads to a finite and nearly identical value of the amplitude, implying that below this amplitude, the vortex cannot form because the wall is too smooth and, hence, stick boundary results prevail.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed by B. J. Alder, September 26, 2007
Author contributions: D.L.C. designed research; D.L.C. performed research; D.L.C., G.B.M., and B.J.A. analyzed data; and D.L.C., G.B.M., and B.J.A. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0709172104