Quantification of microporosity in fruit by MRI at various magnetic fields: comparison with X-ray microtomography

Abstract Microstructure determines the mechanical and transport properties of fruit tissues. One important characteristic of the microstructure is the relative volume fraction of gas-filled intercellular spaces, i.e., the tissue microporosity. Quantification of this microporosity is fundamental for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 1525 - 1534
Main Authors: Musse, Maja, De Guio, François, Quellec, Stéphane, Cambert, Mireille, Challois, Sylvain, Davenel, Armel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01-12-2010
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Microstructure determines the mechanical and transport properties of fruit tissues. One important characteristic of the microstructure is the relative volume fraction of gas-filled intercellular spaces, i.e., the tissue microporosity. Quantification of this microporosity is fundamental for investigating the relationship between gas transfer and various disorders in fruit. We present a new method for quantifying the apparent microporosity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The method is based on the differences in magnetic susceptibility between gas-filled intercellular spaces and their environment inside fruit tissues. It was tested at two different magnetic fields (1.5 and 0.2 T) on apple and tomato fruit. The method was validated by comparing the MRI results with estimation of local tissue porosity using X-ray microtomography experiments. MRI was shown to be effective in determining the distribution of apparent microporosity in fruit.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0730-725X
1053-1807
1873-5894
1522-2586
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.028