Cell‐free human papillomavirus DNA kinetics after surgery for human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal cancer

Background New ultrasensitive methods for detecting residual disease after surgery are needed in human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC). Methods To determine whether the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPVDNA) is associat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer Vol. 128; no. 11; pp. 2193 - 2204
Main Authors: O'Boyle, Connor J., Siravegna, Giulia, Varmeh, Shohreh, Queenan, Natalia, Michel, Alexa, Pang, Kim Chang Sing, Stein, Jarrod, Thierauf, Julia C., Sadow, Peter M., Faquin, William C., Wang, Wei, Deschler, Daniel G., Emerick, Kevin S., Varvares, Mark A., Park, Jong C., Clark, John R., Chan, Annie W., Busse, Paul M., Corcoran, Ryan B., Wirth, Lori J., Lin, Derrick T., Iafrate, A. John, Richmon, Jeremy D., Faden, Daniel L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-06-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background New ultrasensitive methods for detecting residual disease after surgery are needed in human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC). Methods To determine whether the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPVDNA) is associated with postoperative disease status, a prospective observational study was conducted in 33 patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing surgery. Blood was collected before surgery, postoperative days 1 (POD 1), 7, and 30 and with follow‐up. A subcohort of 12 patients underwent frequent blood collections in the first 24 hours after surgery to define early clearance kinetics. Plasma was run on custom droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays for HPV genotypes 16, 18, 33, 35, and 45. Results In patients without pathologic risk factors for recurrence who were observed after surgery, ctHPVDNA rapidly decreased to <1 copy/mL by POD 1 (n = 8/8). In patients with risk factors for macroscopic residual disease, ctHPVDNA was markedly elevated on POD 1 (>350 copies/mL) and remained elevated until adjuvant treatment (n = 3/3). Patients with intermediate POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels (1.2‐58.4 copies/mL) all possessed pathologic risk factors for microscopic residual disease (n = 9/9). POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels were higher in patients with known adverse pathologic risk factors such as extranodal extension >1 mm (P = .0481) and with increasing lymph nodes involved (P = .0453) and were further associated with adjuvant treatment received (P = .0076). One of 33 patients had a recurrence that was detected by ctHPVDNA 2 months earlier than clinical detection. Conclusions POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels are associated with the risk of residual disease in patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing curative intent surgery and thus could be used as a personalized biomarker for selecting adjuvant treatment in the future. Lay Summary Human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) is increasing at epidemic proportions and is commonly treated with surgery. This report describes results from a study examining the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor HPV DNA (circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA [ctHPVDNA]) following surgical treatment of HPV+OPSCC. We found that ctHPVDNA levels 1 day after surgery are associated with the risk of residual disease in patients with HPV+OPSCC and thus could be used as a personalized biomarker for selecting adjuvant treatment in the future. These findings are the first to demonstrate the potential utility of ctHPVDNA in patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing surgery. This report describes results from a study examining the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA after surgical treatment of HPV+ head and neck cancer. It is the first report across HPV‐associated cancers to show that HPV liquid biopsy after surgery could be used as a marker of residual disease status.
Bibliography:this issue.
The last two authors contributed equally to this article.
The first two authors contributed equally to this article.
See editorial on pages
2061‐2063
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Connor J. O’Boyle: Formal analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. Giulia Siravegna: Data curation, formal analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing, investigation, and methodology. Shohreh Varmeh: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and methodology. Natalia Queenan: Project administration. Alexa Michel: Formal analysis and investigation. Kim Chang Sing Pang: Investigation. Jarrod Stein: Investigation. Julia C. Thierauf: Investigation. Peter M. Sadow: Formal analysis. William C. Faquin: Formal analysis. Wei Wang: Formal analysis. Daniel G. Deschler: Resources, and writing–review and editing. Kevin S. Emerick: Resources and writing–review and editing. Mark A. Varvares: Resources and writing–review and editing. Jong C. Park: Resources and writing–review and editing. John R. Clark: Resources and writing–review and editing. Annie W. Chan: Resources and writing–review and editing. Paul M. Busse: Resources and writing–review and editing. Ryan B. Corcoran: Resources and writing–review and editing. Lori J. Wirth: Resources and writing–review and editing. Derrick T. Lin: Resources and writing–review and editing. A. John Iafrate: Resources, writing–review and editing, formal analysis, funding acquisition, conceptualization, and supervision. Jeremy D. Richmon: Resources, writing–review and editing, funding acquisition, and supervision conceptualization. Daniel L. Faden: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, visualization, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34109