Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy

• Published in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1627 - 1633
• Main Authors: Danieli, Marcus Vinicius, Guerreiro, João Paulo Fernandes, Queiroz, Alexandre deOliveira, Pereira, Hamilton daRosa, Tagima, Susi, Marini, Marcelo Garcia, Cataneo, Daniele Cristina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-05-2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Agreements; Arthroscopy; Cartilage; Cartilage Diseases - diagnosis; Cartilage Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Cartilage, Articular - injuries; Child; Female; Humans; Injuries; Knee; Knee Injuries - classification; Knee Injuries - diagnosis; Knee Joint - pathology; Knee Joint - surgery; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Surgery; Young Adult; Brazil; Knee; Arthroscopy; Articular cartilage; Magnetic resonance imaging; Injury
• ISSN: 0942-2056; 1433-7347
• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3622-8

Purpose
To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for chondral lesions. The hypothesis was that MRI displays low sensitivity in the diagnosis and classification of chondral injuries.
Methods
A total of 83 knees were evaluated. The MRIs were performed using the same machine (GE SIGNA HDX 1.45 T). The MRI results were compared with the arthroscopy findings, and an agreement analysis was performed. Thirty-eight of the 83 MRI exams were evaluated by another radiologist for inter-observer agreement analysis. These analyses were performed using the kappa (
κ
) coefficient.
Results
The highest incidence of chondral injury was in the patella (14.4 %). The
κ
coefficient was 0.31 for the patellar surface; 0.38 for the trochlea; 0.46 for the medial femoral condyle; 0.51 for the lateral femoral condyle; and 0.19 for the lateral plateau. After dividing the injuries into two groups (ICRS Grades 0–II and Grades III and IV), the following
κ
coefficients were obtained as follows: 0.49 (patella); 0.53 (trochlea); 0.46 (medial femoral condyle); 0.43 (medial plateau); 0.67 (lateral femoral condyle); and 0.51 (lateral plateau). The MRI sensitivity was 76.4 % (patella), 88.2 % (trochlea), 69.7 % (medial femoral condyle), 85.7 % (medial plateau), 81.8 % (lateral femoral condyle) and 75 % (lateral plateau). Comparing the radiologists’ evaluations, the following
κ
coefficients were obtained as follows: 0.73 (patella); 0.63 (trochlea); 0.84 (medial femoral condyle); 0.72 (medial plateau); 0.77 (lateral femoral condyle); and 0.91 (lateral plateau).
Conclusion
Compared with arthroscopy, MRI displays moderate sensitivity for detecting and classifying chondral knee injuries. It is an important image method, but we must be careful in the assessment of patients with suspected chondral lesions.
Level of evidence
III.