Smoking and olfactory dysfunction: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis

Objectives/Hypothesis A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature was undertaken, examining the association between tobacco smoking and olfactory function in humans, utilizing PubMed and Web of Science (1970–2015) as data sources. Study Design Systematic literature review and meta‐analys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 127; no. 8; pp. 1753 - 1761
Main Authors: Ajmani, Gaurav S., Suh, Helen H., Wroblewski, Kristen E., Pinto, Jayant M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-08-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature was undertaken, examining the association between tobacco smoking and olfactory function in humans, utilizing PubMed and Web of Science (1970–2015) as data sources. Study Design Systematic literature review and meta‐analysis. Methods This database review of studies of smoking and olfaction, with a focus on identifying high‐quality studies (based on modified versions of the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale), used validated olfactory tests among the generally healthy population. Results We identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Of 10 cross‐sectional studies, two were excluded from meta‐analysis because the cohorts they studied were included in another article in the review. In meta‐analysis, current smokers had substantially higher odds of olfactory dysfunction compared to never smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37–1.85). In contrast, former smokers were found to have no difference in risk of impaired olfaction compared to never smokers (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91–1.21). The single longitudinal study reviewed found a trend toward increased risk of olfactory decline over time in ever smokers; this trend was stronger in current as compared to former smokers. Conclusions Current smoking, but not former smoking, is associated with significantly increased risk of olfactory dysfunction, suggesting that the effects of smoking on olfaction may be reversible. Future studies that prospectively evaluate the impact of smoking cessation on improvement in olfactory function are warranted. Level of Evidence N/A. Laryngoscope, 127:1753–1761, 2017
Bibliography:The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
G.S.A. received funding from the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. H.H.S. received support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES022657). K.E.W. received support from the National Institute on Aging (R37 AG030481; R01 AG033903). J.M.P. received support from the National Institute on Aging (K23 AG036762), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19 AI106683, Chronic Rhinosinusitis Integrative Studies Program; P01 AI097092), and Center on the Demography and Economics of Aging. The National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project is supported by the National Institutes of Health, including the National Institute on Aging, Office of Women's Health Research, Office of AIDS Research, and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (R01 AG021487).
No funding bodies had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.26558