review and meta‐analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae
Marine organisms are simultaneously exposed to anthropogenic stressors with likely interactive effects, including synergisms in which the combined effects of multiple stressors are greater than the sum of individual effects. Early life stages of marine organisms are potentially vulnerable to the str...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global change biology Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 2122 - 2140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Science
01-06-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Marine organisms are simultaneously exposed to anthropogenic stressors with likely interactive effects, including synergisms in which the combined effects of multiple stressors are greater than the sum of individual effects. Early life stages of marine organisms are potentially vulnerable to the stressors associated with global change, but identifying general patterns across studies, species and response variables is challenging. This review represents the first meta‐analysis of multistressor studies to target early marine life stages (embryo to larvae), particularly between temperature, salinity and pH as these are the best studied. Knowledge gaps in research on multiple abiotic stressors and early life stages are also identified. The meta‐analysis yielded several key results: (1) Synergistic interactions (65% of individual tests) are more common than additive (17%) or antagonistic (17%) interactions. (2) Larvae are generally more vulnerable than embryos to thermal and pH stress. (3) Survival is more likely than sublethal responses to be affected by thermal, salinity and pH stress. (4) Interaction types vary among stressors, ontogenetic stages and biological responses, but they are more consistent among phyla. (5) Ocean acidification is a greater stressor for calcifying than noncalcifying larvae. Despite being more ecologically realistic than single‐factor studies, multifactorial studies may still oversimplify complex systems, and so meta‐analyses of the data from them must be cautiously interpreted with regard to extrapolation to field conditions. Nonetheless, our results identify taxa with early life stages that may be particularly vulnerable (e.g. molluscs, echinoderms) or robust (e.g. arthropods, cnidarians) to abiotic stress. We provide a list of recommendations for future multiple stressor studies, particularly those focussed on early marine life stages. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12833 istex:2D3B7C1508A4505D31F19B409ACDCF82C7AE1B4B ARC - No. DE140100701; No. DP100105298 Australian Government's National Environmental Research Program (NERP) ArticleID:GCB12833 Table S1. List of studies and species included in the gap analysis (after preliminary selection criteria applied) and in the meta-analysis (highlighted, after refined selection criteria applied).Table S2. Summary of results from generalized linear mixed-effects models with Hedge's das a function of stressor combinations (temperature × salinity, temperature × pH) using a range of covariates related to hypotheses.Figure S1. Funnel plots of the temperature/salinity (left) and temperature/pH (right) interactions showing no evidence of publication bias. The vertical dashed line shows the mean effect size. The solid line indicates the null value. The absence of asymmetry in the funnel plots [as evidenced by an absence of correlation between effect size and the inverse standard error; Spearman's ρ = 0.17, P = 0.26 (left) and ρ = 0.37, P = 0.05 (right)] indicates no likelihood of underreporting the lack of synergistic or antagonistic effects.Data S4. Reference list based on preliminary and refined selection criteria. ark:/67375/WNG-5LPVZ18N-T ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/gcb.12833 |