The perceptions of midwives regarding audit and feedback on the use of the partogram at Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa

• Published in: Curationis (Pretoria) Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 1 - 6
• Main Author: Lumadi, Thanyani
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: South Africa AOSIS 31-08-2017; African Online Scientific Information Systems (Pty) Ltd t/a AOSIS; AOSIS (Pty) Ltd; Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa (DENOSA)
• Subjects: Adult; Auditing; Audits; Biology; Clinical medicine; Developing countries; Dictionaries; Documentation; Employee performance; Feedback; Female; Fetal Monitoring - utilization; Health Care Sciences & Services; Health Policy & Services; Humans; Infants; LDCs; Maternal child nursing; Medical personnel; Middle Aged; Midwifery education; Midwives; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods; Mortality; Mothers; Nurse Midwives - psychology; Nurse Midwives - standards; Nursing; Obstetrics; Original Research; Patient outcomes; Perception; Perceptions; Professionals; Public health; Qualitative Research; Reproductive health; South Africa; Womens health; South Africa; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 0379-8577; 2223-6279; 2223-6279
• DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v40i1.1770

Background: Audit and feedback is regarded as the cornerstone of clinical teaching to guarantee good practice and to correct poor performance. Feedback given to health professionals assists in narrowing the gap between the actual and the desired information. The findings of the research study on perceptions of midwives on audit and feedback highlighted aspects that needed improvement to address challenges on the use and documentation of the partogram. Objectives: The objectives of this article were to explore and describe the perceptions of midwives on auditing of the partogram by health professionals and to explore and describe the perceptions of midwives on the feedback that was given after audit was done. Method: A qualitative, exploratory and descriptive study was conducted to answer the two research objectives. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 17 midwives who were working in the labour wards of three hospitals. Eight steps of qualitative data analysis as indicated by Tesch were used to analyse the data. Results: The findings revealed that auditing and feedback is sometimes done by midwives themselves, midwives’ managers and district managers. Audit is done monthly or on a daily basis and sometimes inconsistently because of shortage of staff. Challenges indicated were lack of knowledge on the use of the partogram and lack of encouragement and praise when documentation was done correctly and that emphasis was mostly placed on negative aspects. Conclusion: The findings revealed that auditing and feedback and in-service education is done at the three hospitals, although challenges such as inconsistency in auditing because of shortage of staff, lack of knowledge on partogram use and on principles of giving feedback were highlighted.