Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome

• Published in: Neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 1110 - 1119
• Main Authors: Self, M. M., Williams, A. E., Czyzewski, D. I., Weidler, E. M., Shulman, R. J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-08-2015
• Subjects: Abdominal Pain - complications; Adolescent; Agreements; Child; Children & youth; children and adolescents; Defecation; Diaries; Diarrhea; Female; functional gastrointestinal disorders; Health Records, Personal; Humans; Irritable bowel syndrome; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - complications; Male; Mental Recall; Pain; pain diary; Questionnaires; Rome III questionnaire; Surveys and Questionnaires; Rome III questionnaire; children and adolescents; functional gastrointestinal disorders; pain diary; irritable bowel syndrome
• ISSN: 1350-1925; 1365-2982
• DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12590

Background
In functional gastrointestinal disorders, patient recall of symptoms drives diagnostic decisions and evaluation of treatment response, and research conclusions about potential treatments. In pediatrics, parent report also impacts assessment and care. Hence, identifying methods for accurately capturing patient and parent report of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms is important. This study evaluated correspondence between retrospective questionnaire (parent and child report) and prospective diary data for children and adolescents with IBS.
Methods
Participants included 50 children/adolescents with IBS per Rome III criteria. Children completed a 2‐week pain and stool diary. Children and parents subsequently completed a 2‐week recall questionnaire, reporting number of pain days, maximum pain, days without bowel movement, and days with diarrhea during the diary interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement.
Key Results
For pain and days without bowel movement, overall agreement between child recall questionnaire and child diary was strong, although under conditions likely to facilitate agreement and with individual variation observed. Parent recall and child diary were less concordant, and agreement about diarrhea was poor for parent and child. Age did not significantly correlate with agreement.
Conclusions & Inferences
Child questionnaire with short recall interval may be a reasonable approximation for diary data, although this varies by individual and replication/investigation of lengthier recall are needed. Relying on parent questionnaire does not appear a suitable proxy, and recall of stool form by both parent and child appears more problematic. These results combined with existing literature support use of diary data whenever possible.