Religious diversity and federalism

The idea of federalism was initially a religious one, applying the idea of a covenant to political organisation. It was from this religious understanding that the modern political understanding of federalism emerged. Some of the critical decisions of the founders of the United States of America were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International social science journal Vol. 53; no. 167; pp. 61 - 65
Main Author: Elazar, Daniel J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 01-03-2001
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Edition:English edition
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The idea of federalism was initially a religious one, applying the idea of a covenant to political organisation. It was from this religious understanding that the modern political understanding of federalism emerged. Some of the critical decisions of the founders of the United States of America were those dealing with the question of religious diversity: in addition to religious ideas of governing by covenant, there was a strong element of separation of church and state, so that no denomination would be favoured over another. In other federal systems, federalism has been used to protect religious diversity in a variety of ways. The period since World War II has been marked by the emergence of new forms of federalism, such as the post‐modern confederation. In many cases the constituent states of these confederal arrangements have had dominant or even established religions of their own differing from those of their associates co‐existing under the religiously neutral framework of the confederation. As the relationship between religion and state continues to undergo re‐evaluation, federalism adds to the range of possibilities for accommodating
Bibliography:istex:AF22844FABACA7BDAF5498959EBEA840ADBBC482
ArticleID:ISSJ293
ark:/67375/WNG-W5Z9F3SL-5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-8701
1468-2451
DOI:10.1111/1468-2451.00293