Charge‐Shift Bonding: A New and Unique Form of Bonding
Charge‐shift bonds (CSBs) constitute a new class of bonds different than covalent/polar‐covalent and ionic bonds. Bonding in CSBs does not arise from either the covalent or the ionic structures of the bond, but rather from the resonance interaction between the structures. This Essay describes the re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Angewandte Chemie International Edition Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 984 - 1001 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Germany
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
13-01-2020
Wiley-VCH Verlag |
Edition: | International ed. in English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Charge‐shift bonds (CSBs) constitute a new class of bonds different than covalent/polar‐covalent and ionic bonds. Bonding in CSBs does not arise from either the covalent or the ionic structures of the bond, but rather from the resonance interaction between the structures. This Essay describes the reasons why the CSB family was overlooked by valence‐bond pioneers and then demonstrates that the unique status of CSBs is not theory‐dependent. Thus, valence bond (VB), molecular orbital (MO), and energy decomposition analysis (EDA), as well as a variety of electron density theories all show the distinction of CSBs vis‐à‐vis covalent and ionic bonds. Furthermore, the covalent–ionic resonance energy can be quantified from experiment, and hence has the same essential status as resonance energies of organic molecules, e.g., benzene. The Essay ends by arguing that CSBs are a distinct family of bonding, with a potential to bring about a Renaissance in the mental map of the chemical bond, and to contribute to productive chemical diversity.
New description of valence bonding: The vertices of the triangle in the figure are labeled with the three variables of electron‐pair bonding, Φcov , Φion , and REcs (charge‐shift resonance energy), which lead to three families of valence bonding, covalent, ionic, and charge‐shift bonding, respectively. A variety of tricky bonding situations such as dative bonds, coordinative bonds, 3e‐bonds, and hypervalent bonds can be best described by charge‐shift bonding. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Dedicated to Roald Hoffmann ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1433-7851 1521-3773 |
DOI: | 10.1002/anie.201910085 |