Mass measurements during lymphocytic leukemia cell polyploidization decouple cell cycle- and cell size-dependent growth

Cell size is believed to influence cell growth and metabolism. Consistently, several studies have revealed that large cells have lower mass accumulation rates per unit mass (i.e., growth efficiency) than intermediate-sized cells in the same population. Sizedependent growth is commonly attributed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 27; pp. 15659 - 15665
Main Authors: Mu, Luye, Kang, Joon Ho, Olcum, Selim, Payer, Kristofor R., Calistri, Nicholas L., Kimmerling, Robert J., Manalis, Scott R., Miettinen, Teemu P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 07-07-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cell size is believed to influence cell growth and metabolism. Consistently, several studies have revealed that large cells have lower mass accumulation rates per unit mass (i.e., growth efficiency) than intermediate-sized cells in the same population. Sizedependent growth is commonly attributed to transport limitations, such as increased diffusion timescales and decreased surface-to-volume ratio. However, separating cell size- and cell cycle-dependent growth is challenging. To address this, we monitored growth efficiency of pseudodiploid mouse lymphocytic leukemia cells during normal proliferation and polyploidization. This was enabled by the development of large-channel suspended microchannel resonators that allow us to monitor buoyant mass of single cells ranging from 40 pg (small pseudodiploid cell) to over 4,000 pg, with a resolution ranging from ∼1% to ∼0.05%. We find that cell growth efficiency increases, plateaus, and then decreases as cell cycle proceeds. This growth behavior repeats with every endomitotic cycle as cells grow into polyploidy. Overall, growth efficiency changes 33% throughout the cell cycle. In contrast, increasing cell mass by over 100-fold during polyploidization did not change growth efficiency, indicating exponential growth. Consistently, growth efficiency remained constant when cell cycle was arrested in G₂. Thus, cell cycle is a primary determinant of growth efficiency. As growth remains exponential over large size scales, our work finds no evidence for transport limitations that would decrease growth efficiency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Marc W. Kirschner, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved May 29, 2020 (received for review December 17, 2019)
2Present address: Center for BioMicrosystems, Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Korea.
1L.M. and J.H.K. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: L.M., J.H.K., S.O., N.L.C., R.J.K., S.R.M., and T.P.M. designed research; L.M., J.H.K., K.R.P., and T.P.M. performed research; S.R.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; L.M. and J.H.K. analyzed data; L.M., J.H.K., S.R.M., and T.P.M. wrote the paper; and S.R.M. and T.P.M. led the project.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1922197117