French national addictovigilance follow-up of zolpidem between 2014 and 2020: evolution of drug abuse, misuse and dependence before and after the regulatory change

Abstract Background Since the appearance of zolpidem on the market, the occurrence of serious cases of abuse, misuse and dependence have come to the attention of authorities. In view of the increase in the number and severity of cases among zolpidem users and the predominant presence of zolpidem in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of public health Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 169 - 175
Main Authors: Aquizerate, Aurélie, Laforgue, Edouard-Jules, Istvan, Marion, Rousselet, Morgane, Gerardin, Marie, Jouanjus, Emilie, Libert, Frédéric, Guerlais, Marylène, Victorri-Vigneau, Caroline
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Oxford University Press 01-04-2023
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B - Oxford Open Option D
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Since the appearance of zolpidem on the market, the occurrence of serious cases of abuse, misuse and dependence have come to the attention of authorities. In view of the increase in the number and severity of cases among zolpidem users and the predominant presence of zolpidem in falsified prescriptions, the French Health Authorities implemented part of the narcotics regulation for zolpidem in April 2017. The objective of this article was to describe the evolution of the abuse, dependence and misuse of zolpidem. Methods We used three data sources: (i) zolpidem is a reimbursable and strictly prescription drug in France. Medic’AM is a public database that indicates the number of tablets reimbursed each month in France for each reimbursable drug. This database has been analyzed as a proxy of the exposure of the French population to zolpidem; (ii) all French cases of drug dependence or abuse reported by health professionals (regulatory obligation) and (iii) an epidemiological tool based on the surveillance of falsified prescriptions over two periods: the 3-year period before the regulatory measure (2014–16) and the 3-year period after the regulatory measure (2018–20). Results This regulatory change had two immediate consequences: a sharp decline in falsified prescriptions and a decrease of ∼57% between the two study periods in the zolpidem reimbursement data. Markers of problematic consumption remained after the regulatory change with worsening cases, particularly for people who were genuinely dependent and/or had comorbidities or misusers for whom zolpidem was the substance of interest, whose proportion increased significantly in the addictovigilance notification system, from 43.6% (N = 107) to 59.3% (N = 127) (P < 0.01). Conclusions Further monitoring is needed in light of these persistent markers of problematic consumption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The members of the French Addictovigilance Network are listed in the Acknowledgements.
ISSN:1101-1262
1464-360X
DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckad003