Sexual dimorphism in upper gastrointestinal motility is dependent on duration of fast, time of day, age, and strain of mice

Background An important limitation of gastrointestinal motility testing is high variability. Conditions that could contribute to variability, including the duration of pretest fasting and time of day, are rarely reported and have not been examined systematically. This study aimed to explore whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. e13654 - n/a
Main Authors: Soni, Krishnakant G., Halder, Tripti, Conner, Margaret E., Preidis, Geoffrey A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-09-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background An important limitation of gastrointestinal motility testing is high variability. Conditions that could contribute to variability, including the duration of pretest fasting and time of day, are rarely reported and have not been examined systematically. This study aimed to explore whether these conditions, as well as age, sex, and strain of mice, affect the results of a standard laboratory test of upper gastrointestinal motility. Methods Male and female 8‐week‐old C57BL/6J mice received a gastric gavage of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)‐conjugated dextran. FITC‐dextran distribution was measured 30 minutes later. Mean geometric centers (MGCs) were calculated to determine the effects of short versus prolonged fasting and morning versus afternoon testing. The influence of age was assessed in 2‐ to 10‐week‐old animals, and the influence of strain was determined in C57BL/6J, BALB/c, and CD‐1 mice. Key results Motility was sexually dimorphic. MGC progressed 19% further in 8‐week‐old C57BL/6J males versus females when tested in the morning after a short fast. Similar patterns were observed in morning or afternoon testing after overnight fasting. In males, motility was unaffected by time of day; however, MGC progressed 31% further in females tested in the afternoon versus morning after a short fast. Sex differences also were present in CD‐1 but not BALB/c mice. Testing in neonates revealed strikingly low variability and no sex differences. Conclusions & inferences Fasting duration, time of day, age, sex, and strain of mice all influence upper gastrointestinal motility testing. Sex differences are not present in neonatal pups, but develop soon after weaning. High variability limits the utility of gastrointestinal motility testing; thus, we sought to determine how altering‐specific experimental conditions influence motility in mice. Gastrointestinal motility is faster in males versus females at 8 weeks of life when testing is performed in the morning following a short fast in C57BL/6J and CD‐1, but not BALB/c, mice. Adapting the test to neonates yields surprisingly low variability and no sex differences.
Bibliography:Funding information
This study was supported by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Research Grants Program (Research Grant to GAP), the American Gastroenterological Association/Rome Foundation (Functional GI and Motility Disorders Pilot Award to GAP), Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation (Physician‐Scientist Award to GAP), the Public Health Service, USA (P30 DK056338, which funds the Texas Medical Center Digestive Diseases Center), and the National Institutes of Health, USA (K08 DK113114 to GAP).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
KGS designed the research study, performed experiments, analyzed the data, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the paper. TH performed experiments and wrote the paper. MEC designed the study, provided technical and scientific support for the study, and wrote the paper. GAP designed the study, obtained funding, performed experiments, analyzed the data, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the paper. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.
ISSN:1350-1925
1365-2982
DOI:10.1111/nmo.13654