Toward acquisition protocol standardization for estimating liver fat content using ultrasound attenuation coefficient imaging

• Published in: Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 446 - 456
• Main Authors: Ferraioli, Giovanna, Raimondi, Ambra, De Silvestri, Annalisa, Filice, Carlo, Barr, Richard G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 01-07-2023
• Subjects: Algorithms; attenuation coefficient; fat quantification; fatty liver; Hypotheses; Liver diseases; liver steatosis; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Original; repeatability studies; Statistical analysis; Ultrasonic imaging; ultrasound; United States > US; Italy; Japan; Fatty liver; Attenuation coefficient; Repeatability studies; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Fat quantification; Ultrasound; Liver steatosis
• ISSN: 2288-5919; 2288-5943
• DOI: 10.14366/usg.23014

This study's primary aim was to assess factors affecting ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) measurement repeatability using the Canon ultrasound (US) system. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether similar results were obtained with other vendors' AC algorithms.
This prospective study was performed at two centers from February to November 2022. AC was obtained using two US systems (Aplio i800 of Canon Medical Systems and Arietta 850 of Fujifilm). An algorithm combining AC and the backscatter coefficient was also used (Sequoia US System, Siemens Healthineers). To evaluate inter-observer concordance, AC was obtained by two expert operators using different transducer positions with regions of interest (ROIs) varying in terms of depth and size. Intra-observer concordance was evaluated on measurements performed intercostally, subcostally, and in the left liver lobe. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was used.
Thirty-four participants (mean age, 49.4±15.1 years; 18 females) were studied. AC values progressively decreased with depth. The measurements in intercostal spaces on bestquality US images using a 3-cm ROI with its upper edge 2 cm below the liver capsule during breath-hold showed the highest intra-observer and inter-observer concordance (0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.95] and 0.89 [0.82 to 0.96], respectively). Measurements in the left lobe showed the lowest intra-observer and inter-observer concordance (0.67 [0.43 to 0.90] and 0.58 [0.12 to 1.00], respectively). Intercostal space measurements also had the highest repeatability for the other two ultrasound systems.
AC values obtained in intercostal spaces on best-quality images using a 3-cm ROI placed with its top 2 cm below the liver capsule were highly repeatable.