Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography-Derived Left Atrial Strain Parameters Are Reduced in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (Results from the MAGYAR-Path Study)

• Published in: Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Vol. 30; no. 9; pp. 1078 - 1083
• Main Authors: Chadaide, Számi, Domsik, Péter, Kalapos, Anita, Sághy, László, Forster, Tamás, Nemes, Attila
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-10-2013
• Subjects: atrial fibrillation; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnostic imaging; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology; Atrial Remodeling; echocardiography; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods; Elastic Modulus; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods; Female; Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging; Heart Atria - physiopathology; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; speckle tracking; strain; Stress, Mechanical; three-dimensional; speckle tracking; strain; atrial fibrillation; three-dimensional; echocardiography
• ISSN: 0742-2822; 1540-8175
• DOI: 10.1111/echo.12218

Objective: Three‐dimensional (3D) speckle tracking echocardiography (3DSTE) is a novel imaging modality for assessing cardiac function. We aimed to analyze left atrial (LA) function using 3DSTE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: 3DSTE was performed in 20 patients prior to their pulmonary vein isolation for AF. Every patient underwent a complete two‐dimensional echocardiographic study at the same time. 3DSTE‐derived circumferential (CS), longitudinal (LS), radial (RS), 3D (3DS), and area strain (AS) values were measured in the basal (b), mid (m), and superior (s) regions of the LA. 3DSTE‐defined maximal (LAmax) and minimal LA volumes (LAmin) and LA total emptying fraction were calculated automatically. Eleven randomly selected age‐ and gender‐matched healthy volunteers served as controls. Results: Patients with AF had significantly larger LAmax and LAmin and reduced LS, RS and CS.3DS and AS were significantly lower throughout the LA in cases with AF (3DS−b, −m, −s [AF patients vs. controls]: −18 ± 8% vs. −29 ± 8%, P = 0.001; −14 ± 6% vs. −22 ± 7%, P = 0.002; −10 ± 7% vs. −20 ± 9%, P = 0.002; AS−b, −m, −s [AF patients vs. controls]: 35 ± 15% vs. 52 ± 13%, P = 0.004; 50 ± 21% vs. 72 ± 19%, P = 0.009; 31 ± 21% vs. 65 ± 27%, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: 3DSTE‐derived “uni‐dimensional” LS, RS, CS, as well as novel strain parameters (3DS, AS) are significantly reduced in patients with AF compared to matched controls. 3DS and AS might be new strain parameters providing further insights into the alterations of LA function in patients developing AF.