Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs. Patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of oncology Vol. 20; no. 7; pp. 1223 - 1229
Main Authors: Cohen, S.J., Punt, C.J.A., Iannotti, N., Saidman, B.H., Sabbath, K.D., Gabrail, N.Y., Picus, J., Morse, M.A., Mitchell, E., Miller, M.C., Doyle, G.V., Tissing, H., Terstappen, L.W.M.M., Meropol, N.J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01-07-2009
Oxford University Press
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs. Patients and methods: CTCs were enumerated with immunomagnetic separation from the blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and on therapy. Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of ≥3 or <3 CTCs/7.5ml, respectively. Subgroups were analyzed by line of treatment, liver involvement, receipt of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or bevacizumab, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). Results: Seventy-one percent of deaths have occurred. Median follow-up for living patients is 25.8 months. For all patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs is shorter (4.4 versus 7.8 m, P=0.004 for PFS; 9.4 versus 20.6 m, P<0.0001 for OS). In all patient subgroups, unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior OS (P<0.001). In patients receiving first- or second-line therapy (P=0.003), irinotecan (P=0.0001), having liver involvement (P=0.002), ≥65 years (P=0.0007), and ECOG PS of zero (P=0.04), unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS. Conclusion: Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics.
Bibliography:istex:B8902E1B5DE35EC749E43FAD48D7BB2A536CE8DA
ark:/67375/HXZ-7MDVCNLF-8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdn786