Trastuzumab beyond progression: Overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3-05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer
Abstract Background Continuation of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (XH) showed a significantly improved overall response rate and time to progression compared with capecitabine (X) alone in women with HER2-positive breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab treatment. Here, we report the final anal...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 47; no. 15; pp. 2273 - 2281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01-10-2011
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Continuation of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (XH) showed a significantly improved overall response rate and time to progression compared with capecitabine (X) alone in women with HER2-positive breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab treatment. Here, we report the final analysis on overall survival. Patients and methods Patients with HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer who progressed during treatment with trastuzumab with or without 1st-line metastatic chemotherapy were prospectively randomised to X (2500 mg/m2 on days 1–14, q3w) or XH (6 (8) mg/kg, q3w). Overall survival was a pre-specified secondary end-point. Results Median follow-up at June 2010 was 20.7 months. Fifty nine of 74 and 60 of 77 patients died in the X and XH arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.6 and 24.9 months with X and XH, respectively (HR = 0.94 [0.65–1.35]; p = 0.73). Performance status and metastatic site were independent prognosticators for overall survival. No difference between treatment arms was observed for patients who achieved clinical response or clinical benefit, respectively. Patients who continued/restarted anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab or lapatinib) after 2nd progression ( N = 52) had a post-progression survival of 18.8 compared with 13.3 months for those who did not receive 3rd line treatment with anti-HER2 agents ( N = 88) (HR 0.63; p = 0.02). Conclusions Final overall survival analysis of the GBG-26 study did not demonstrate a significant survival benefit for treatment beyond progression with trastuzumab. However, in a post-hoc analysis, patients receiving anti-HER2 treatment as 3rd line therapy showed a better post-progression survival than those not receiving this targeted treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.021 |