Recent advances in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and the role of targeted therapies
Abstract Immunotherapy confers a small but significant overall survival advantage in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but only for the minority of patients, i.e. the 20% with good prognostic features. Recent developments in the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma have identified multiple...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 44; no. 15; pp. 2152 - 2161 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01-10-2008
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Immunotherapy confers a small but significant overall survival advantage in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but only for the minority of patients, i.e. the 20% with good prognostic features. Recent developments in the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma have identified multiple pathways associated with the development of this cancer. Several strategies have been investigated targeting these pathways, with significant clinical benefits shown in early studies. New agents including the small molecule targeted inhibitors sunitinib, sorafenib and temsirolimus, and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab have shown anti-tumour activity in randomised clinical trials and have become the standard of care for most patients. Sunitinib and temsirolimus have shown significant improvements in progression-free survival (sunitinib) and overall survival (temsirolimus) in separate phase III studies in the first-line setting when compared with interferon-α. Sorafenib has demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival in a phase III study in comparison with placebo in the second-line setting. More recently two phase III studies have compared bevacizumab and interferon-α with interferon-α alone. Both studies showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for the combination arm. Additional studies are needed to optimise the use of these agents by identifying those patients who most benefit and elucidating the best way of delivering them, either in combination or as sequential single agents. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.028 |