Short‐term very low caloric intake causes endothelial dysfunction and increased susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias and pathology in male rats

• Published in: Experimental physiology Vol. 105; no. 7; pp. 1172 - 1184
• Main Authors: Almeida, Jônathas F. Q., Shults, Nataliia, Souza, Aline M. A., Ji, Hong, Wu, Xie, Woods, James, Sandberg, Kathryn
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-07-2020; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Acetylcholine; Angiotensin; Angiotensin II; Arrhythmia; Arteries; Body weight; Body weight loss; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiomyocytes; Food availability; Food intake; Heart rate; Hematocrit; Hypocaloric diet; inadequate food intake; Ischemia; langendorff; Lysis; Natural disasters; Nutrient deficiency; Phenylephrine; Reperfusion; Research Paper; Research Papers; Rodents; Socioeconomic factors; vascular reactivity; Vasoconstrictors; vascular reactivity; inadequate food intake; langendorff
• ISSN: 0958-0670; 1469-445X
• DOI: 10.1113/EP088434

New Findings
What is the central question of this study?
What are the effects of a 2 week period of severe food restriction on vascular reactivity of resistance arteries and on cardiac structure and function?
What is the main finding and its importance?
This study showed, for the first time, that a 2 week period of severe food restriction in adult male Fischer rats caused endothelial dysfunction in mesenteric arteries and increased the susceptibility to ischaemia–reperfusion‐induced arrhythmias and cardiac pathology. Our findings might have ramifications for cardiovascular risk in people who experience periods of inadequate caloric intake.
Severe food restriction (sFR) is a common dieting strategy for rapid weight loss. Male Fischer rats were maintained on a control (CT) or sFR (40% of CT food intake) diet for 14 days to mimic low‐calorie crash diets. The sFR diet reduced body weight by 16%. Haematocrits were elevated by 10% in the sFR rats, which was consistent with the reduced plasma volume. Mesenteric arteries from sFR rats had increased sensitivity to vasoconstrictors, including angiotensin II [maximum (%): CT, 1.30 ± 0.46 versus sFR, 11.5 ± 1.6; P < 0.0001; n = 7] and phenylephrine [maximum (%): CT, 78.5 ± 2.8 versus sFR, 94.5 ± 1.7; P < 0.001; n = 7] and reduced sensitivity to the vasodilator acetylcholine [EC50 (nm): CT, 49.2 ± 5.2 versus sFR, 71.6 ± 6.8; P < 0.05; n = 7]. Isolated hearts from sFR rats had a 1.7‐fold increase in the rate of cardiac arrhythmias in response to ischaemia–reperfusion and more cardiac pathology, including myofibrillar disarray with contractions and cardiomyocyte lysis, than hearts from CT rats. The sFR dietary regimen is similar to very low‐calorie commercial and self‐help weight‐loss programmes, which provide ∼800–1000 kcal day−1. Therefore, these findings in rats warrant the study of cardiovascular function in individuals who engage in extreme dieting or are subjected to bouts of very low caloric intake for other reasons, such as socioeconomic factors and natural disasters.