Optimize negotiation price in construction procurement using Bayesian Fuzzy Game Model

The challenge of construction procurement negotiation arises partly because each negotiation side has private information on their payoff function but is uninformed of the values and strategies of the opposite side. The uncertain and limited contractor information as well as complex correlations amo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:KSCE journal of civil engineering Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 1566 - 1572
Main Authors: Leu, Sou-Sen, Hong Son, Pham Vu, Hong Nhung, Pham Thi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Seoul Korean Society of Civil Engineers 01-09-2015
Springer Nature B.V
대한토목학회
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The challenge of construction procurement negotiation arises partly because each negotiation side has private information on their payoff function but is uninformed of the values and strategies of the opposite side. The uncertain and limited contractor information as well as complex correlations among various factors affect contractor behaviors, making learning a supplier’s negotiation strategy and deciding the appropriate offer price difficult for contractors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to apply the forecasting ability of a novel Bayesian Fuzzy Game Model (BFGM) in providing negotiation support and recommendations for contractors determining an appropriate current bid price. The validation analysis revealed that the contractor can foresee the supplier’s future bidding strategy to increase the success rate and profit, reduce the time spent in unnecessary negotiation, and improve negotiation efficiency in the construction material procurement process. Based upon the survey data from Taiwan and Vietnam, the preliminary validation of the model shows that both contractor and supplier can obtain the profitable agreement by applying the BFGM within a reasonable negotiation time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-000839.2015.19.6.006
ISSN:1226-7988
1976-3808
DOI:10.1007/s12205-014-0522-2