Predictors of difficult intubation defined by the intubation difficulty scale (IDS): predictive value of 7 airway assessment factors

• Published in: Korean journal of anesthesiology Vol. 63; no. 6; pp. 491 - 497
• Main Authors: Seo, Suk-Hwan, Lee, Jeong-Gil, Yu, Soo-Bong, Kim, Doo-Sik, Ryu, Sie-Jeong, Kim, Kyung-Han
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 01-12-2012; Korean Society of Anesthesiologists; 대한마취통증의학회
• Subjects: anesthesia; Clinical; evaluation studies; intubation; 마취과학; Evaluation studies; Anesthesia; Intubation
• ISSN: 2005-6419; 2005-7563
• DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.491

The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) has been used as a validated difficulty score to define difficult intubation (DI). The purpose of this study is to identify airway assessment factors and total airway score (TAS) for predicting DI defined by the IDS.
There were 305 ASA physical status 1-2 patients, aged 19-70 years, who underwent elective surgery with endotracheal intubation. During the pre-anesthetic visit, we evaluated patients by 7 preoperative airway assessment factors, including the following: Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, head & neck movement, body mass index (BMI), buck teeth, inter-incisor gap, and upper lip bite test (ULBT). After endotracheal intubation, patients were divided into 2 groups based on their IDS score estimated with 7 variables: normal (IDS < 5) and DI (IDS ≥ 5) groups. The incidence of TAS (> 6) and high score of each airway assessment factor was compared in two groups: odds ratio, confidence interval (CI) of 95%, with a significant P value ≤ 0.05.
The odds ratio of TAS (> 6), ULBT (class III), head & neck movement (< 90°), inter-incisor gap (< 4 cm), BMI (≥ 25 kg/m(2)) and Mallampati classification (≥ class III) were respectively 13.57 (95% CI = 2.99-61.54, P < 0.05), 12.48 (95% CI = 2.50-62.21, P < 0.05), 3.11 (95% CI = 0.87-11.13), 2.32 (95% CI = 0.75-7.19), 2.22 (95% CI = 0.81-6.06), and 1.22 (95% CI = 0.38-3.89).
We suggest that TAS (> 6) and ULBT (class III) are the most useful factors predicting DI.