Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma

Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 333 - 342
Main Authors: Lin, Gigin, Yang, Lan-Yan, Huang, Yu-Ting, Ng, Koon-Kwan, Ng, Shu-Hang, Ueng, Shir-Hwa, Chao, Angel, Yen, Tzu-Chen, Chang, Ting-Chang, Lai, Chyong-Huey
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-02-2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) / smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyoma. Materials and Methods A consecutive cohort of 8 LMS/STUMP and 25 benign leiomyomas underwent pelvic MRI exam at 3T. Two radiologists independently evaluated images based on CE‐MRI (central nonenhancement at equilibrial phase) and DWI (hyperintensity on b = 1000 s/mm2 and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficients [ADC] map). The ADC values were calculated from b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Results CE‐MRI yielded a significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (0.94 vs. 0.52) and a significantly higher specificity (0.96 vs. 0.36) than DWI (P < 0.05 for both), and remained a comparably high sensitivity as DWI (0.88 vs. 1.00). A combination of DWI and ADC value <1.08 × 10−3 mm2/s (determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis) improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DWI to 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively, by post‐hoc analysis based on the same study cohort. Conclusion For prospective differentiation between uterine LMS/STUMP and benign leiomyoma, CE‐MRI can provide accurate information and is preferable to DWI. Combination of DWI and ADC values can achieve a comparable diagnostic accuracy to CE‐MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:333–342.
Bibliography:National Science Council, Taiwan - No. NSC100-2325-B-182-008; No. NSC 103-2314-B-182A-006; No. NMRPD1A0842. IRB 97-2366B.
ArticleID:JMRI24998
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - No. CMRPG-370444; No. 290262
ark:/67375/WNG-L9D0BC1Q-1
istex:C64F46F9B033AEE89ABD839673C64CC8577E36A6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.24998