Analysis of complement receptor Type 1 expression on red blood cells in negative phenotypes of the Knops blood group system, according to CR1 gene allotype polymorphisms

BACKGROUND: The KN blood group system, which consists of nine antigen specificities, is located on complement receptor Type 1 (CR1/CD35). CR1, a complement regulatory protein, acts as a vehicle for immune complex clearance. CR1 exhibits a red blood cell (RBC) density polymorphism. CR1 sites on RBCs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 50; no. 7; pp. 1435 - 1443
Main Authors: Pham, Bach-Nga, Kisserli, Aymric, Donvito, Béatrice, Duret, Valérie, Reveil, Brigitte, Tabary, Thierry, Le Pennec, Pierre-Yves, Peyrard, Thierry, Rouger, Philippe, Cohen, Jacques H.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-07-2010
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: The KN blood group system, which consists of nine antigen specificities, is located on complement receptor Type 1 (CR1/CD35). CR1, a complement regulatory protein, acts as a vehicle for immune complex clearance. CR1 exhibits a red blood cell (RBC) density polymorphism. CR1 sites on RBCs in normal individuals range from 150 to 1200 molecules per cell. CR1 density polymorphism is regulated by HindIII restriction fragment length polymorphism and Q981H and P1786R polymorphisms in Caucasians. Yet, the role of the different polymorphisms in determining the CR1 density on RBCs remains unknown. The “null” serologic KN phenotype, known as Helgeson phenotype, was reported to be related with a very low CR1 density, less than 150 molecules per cell. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this work was to investigate whether the KN‐negative phenotype displayed by 60 individuals was related to the CR1 density by performing the phenotypic and genetic analysis of CR1 and to investigate the molecular background associated with the KN system. RESULTS: We showed that the Helgeson‐like phenotype had a prevalence of 12% in this population. The overall genotype/phenotype concordance was 90%. Among individuals with a KN‐negative phenotype, the prevalences of Kn(a–), McC(a–), Sl1‐negative, Sl3‐negative, and KCAM‐negative deduced phenotype were 37, 12, 29, 7, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: From our data, we suggest that the definition of the Helgeson phenotype must be revised, since the latter may be due not only to a very low CR1 density on RBCs, but also to the absence of expression of a high‐prevalence KN antigen.
Bibliography:istex:CAFD761FF532E95C1BA2AD75D80A0974B49B9D09
ArticleID:TRF2599
ark:/67375/WNG-8MJVM9WG-X
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02599.x