Epidemiology of Maternal Nutritional Status and Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes in Undernourished Mothers with Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol

• Published in: Methods and protocols Vol. 6; no. 5; p. 88
• Main Authors: Klein, Lauren J, Ayete-Nyampong, John Benaiah, Williams, Annette M, Harding, Lori A, Oppong, Samuel A, Acra, Sari, DeBaun, Michael R, Imdad, Aamer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 17-09-2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Birth weight; Body mass index; Citations; Colombia; Epidemiology; Fetuses; Gestational age; Hypotheses; Infant mortality; Librarians; Low birth weight; Malnutrition; Meta-analysis; Morbidity; Mortality; Nutrition; Nutritional status; Pregnancy; Pregnant women; Reviews; Sickle cell anemia; Sickle cell disease; Study Protocol; Systematic review; Womens health; Colombia; nutritional status; systematic review; pregnancy; sickle cell anemia
• ISSN: 2409-9279; 2409-9279
• DOI: 10.3390/mps6050088

In pregnancies complicated by sickle cell disease (SCD), the maternal-fetal dyad is at high risk for mortality and morbidity. In healthy pregnancies, maternal nutritional status is a critical factor for the healthy growth and development of the fetus. However, there are no reviews of the current research on the nutritional status of pregnant women with SCD and pregnancy outcomes. First, we aim to assess the burden of malnutrition in pregnant women with SCD. Next, we aim to systematically evaluate if pregnant women with SCD who have poor nutritional status are at increased risk for adverse birth outcomes compared to pregnant women with sickle cell disease and normal nutritional status. We will systematically search multiple electronic databases. Our exposure is pregnant women with SCD and poor nutritional status. The primary outcomes of interest include low birth weight (categorical) and birth weight z-scores (continuous). We will also evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes as secondary outcomes. We will evaluate the risk of bias and overall certainty of evidence with Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the overall evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We will pool findings with a meta-analysis if sufficient homogeneity exists among studies. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to SCD advocacy groups. PROSPERO registration number: 429412.