Oral contraceptive use, bone mineral density, and bone turnover markers over 12 months in college-aged females

Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers between combined oral contraceptive (COC) and non-COC users over 12 months. Materials and methods COC users ( n  = 34, age = 19.2 ± 0.5) and non-COC users ( n  = 28, age = 19.3 ± 0.6) provided...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bone and mineral metabolism Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 544 - 554
Main Authors: Almstedt, Hawley C., Cook, Makenzie M., Bramble, Lily F., Dabir, Deepa V., LaBrie, Joseph W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 01-07-2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers between combined oral contraceptive (COC) and non-COC users over 12 months. Materials and methods COC users ( n  = 34, age = 19.2 ± 0.5) and non-COC users ( n  = 28, age = 19.3 ± 0.6) provided serum at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. C-terminal telopepetides (CTX) and pro-collagen type 1 N-terminal propeptides (P1NP) were determined using ELISA. BMD was measured at the three time points using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results COC users had greater CTX than non-COC users at baseline (18.6 ± 8.2 vs. 13.8 ± 5.3 ng/mL, P  = 0.021) and 6 months (20.4 ± 10.3 vs. 14.2 ± 8.5 ng/mL, P  = 0.018). Controlling for lean mass, groups were similar in BMD. Over 12 months, non-COC users maintained BMD at the spine, while the COC users declined 2.2% in lateral spine BMD (0.773 ± 0.014 to 0.756 ± 0.014 g/cm 2 , P  = 0.03) and 0.7% in anterior–posterior spine BMD (1.005 ± 0.015 to 0.998 ± 0.015 g/cm 2 , P  = 0.069). Non-COC users increased in BMD of the whole body over 12 months ( P  < 0.001) while COC users had no change. Women who began COCs within 4 years after menarche had lower BMD at the hip and whole body. Women taking very low dose COCs (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol, EE) significantly declined in CTX, P1NP, and lateral spine BMD in comparison to participants using low dose COCs (30/35 mcg EE). Conclusion College-aged women who did not use COCs increased BMD of the whole body, while COC users had elevated bone turnover, declines in spinal BMD, and lack of bone acquisition of the whole body over 12 months. Young females who initiate COC use early after menarche may experience skeletal detriments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions HCA developed methodology and performed conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing, project administration, and funding acquisition. MMC and LFB were responsible for data curation, formal analysis, and contributed to writing. DVD contributed to methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing. JWL was involved with data curation, methodology, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition.
ISSN:0914-8779
1435-5604
DOI:10.1007/s00774-019-01081-1