An Overprotective Nose? Implicit Bias Is Positively Related to Individual Differences in Body Odor Disgust Sensitivity

Body odors are universal elicitors of disgust, a core emotion that plays a key role in the behavioral immune system (BIS) - a set of psychological functions working to avoid disease. Recent studies showed that body odor disgust sensitivity (BODS) is associated with explicit xenophobia and authoritar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 301
Main Authors: Zakrzewska, Marta Zuzanna, Liuzza, Marco Tullio, Lindholm, Torun, Blomkvist, Anna, Larsson, Maria, Olofsson, Jonas K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 28-02-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Body odors are universal elicitors of disgust, a core emotion that plays a key role in the behavioral immune system (BIS) - a set of psychological functions working to avoid disease. Recent studies showed that body odor disgust sensitivity (BODS) is associated with explicit xenophobia and authoritarianism. In the current experimental pre-registered study (https://osf.io/6jkp2/), we investigated the association between olfactory pathogen cues, BODS and implicit bias toward an outgroup (tested by an implicit association test). Results show that BODS is positively related to implicit bias toward an outgroup, suggesting that social attitudes may be linked to basic chemosensory processes. These attitudes were not influenced by background odors. Additionally, BODS was related to social, but not economic conservatism. This study extends the BIS framework to an experimental context by focusing on the role of disgust and body odors in shaping implicit bias.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Anthony P. Atkinson, Durham University, United Kingdom
This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Valentina Parma, Temple University, United States; Rene Alexander De Wijk, Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands
These authors share first authorship
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00301