Risk Stratification of Future Left Ventricular Dysfunction for Patients with Indications for Right Ventricular Pacing due to Bradycardia

• Published in: International Heart Journal Vol. 58; no. 5; pp. 724 - 730
• Main Authors: Ooka, Junichi, Tanaka, Hidekazu, Hatani, Yutaka, Hatazawa, Keiko, Matsuzoe, Hiroki, Shimoura, Hiroyuki, Sano, Hiroyuki, Sawa, Takuma, Motoji, Yoshiki, Mochizuki, Yasuhide, Ryo-Koriyama, Keiko, Matsumoto, Kensuke, Fukuzawa, Koji, Hirata, Ken-ichi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan International Heart Journal Association 01-09-2017; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Aged; Bradycardia; Bradycardia - complications; Bradycardia - physiopathology; Bradycardia - therapy; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods; Cardiovascular diseases; Defibrillators; Dyssynchrony; Echocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart diseases; Heart failure; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology; Humans; Incidence; Japan - epidemiology; Left ventricular function; Male; Patients; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Right ventricular pacing; Risk Assessment - methods; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume - physiology; Ventricle; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnosis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - epidemiology; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - etiology; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology; Heart failure; Dyssynchrony; Right ventricular pacing; Echocardiography; Left ventricular function
• ISSN: 1349-2365; 1349-3299
• DOI: 10.1536/ihj.16-415

Although right ventricular (RV) pacing is the only effective treatment for patients with symptomatic bradycardia, it creates left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, which can induce LV dysfunction and heart failure. The current criterion for consideration of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, but indication for CRT in patients required for RV pacing with LVEF > 35% remains unclear.We studied 40 patients, all LVEF ≥ 35%, who had undergone implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with RV pacing < 5%. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and during RV pacing. LV dyssynchrony was defined as anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay from the mid-LV short-axis view using two-dimensional speckle-tracking radial strain (significant: ≥ 130 ms). Patients were divided into two groups based on baseline LVEF: normal LVEF ( ≥ 50%; n = 20) and mildly reduced LVEF (35-50%; n = 20).LVEF and LV dyssynchrony in patients with mildly reduced LVEF deteriorated significantly during RV pacing compared to those in patients with normal LVEF. Moreover, changes in LV dyssynchrony during RV pacing significantly correlated with changes in LVEF (r = -0.44, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline LVEF was the only independent predictor and baseline LVEF < 48% predictive of significant LV dyssynchrony during RV pacing.The extent of RV pacing-induced LV dysfunction may be associated with baseline LV function. These adverse effects on patients with mildly reduced LVEF of 35-50% and indications for RV pacing due to bradycardia can thus be prevented by CRT.