Brain responses to audiovisual speech mismatch in infants are associated with individual differences in looking behaviour
Research on audiovisual speech integration has reported high levels of individual variability, especially among young infants. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that this variability results from individual differences in the maturation of audiovisual speech processing during infancy. A...
Saved in:
Published in: | The European journal of neuroscience Vol. 38; no. 9; pp. 3363 - 3369 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-11-2013
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Research on audiovisual speech integration has reported high levels of individual variability, especially among young infants. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that this variability results from individual differences in the maturation of audiovisual speech processing during infancy. A developmental shift in selective attention to audiovisual speech has been demonstrated between 6 and 9 months with an increase in the time spent looking to articulating mouths as compared to eyes (Lewkowicz & Hansen‐Tift. (2012) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 1431–1436; Tomalski et al. (2012) Eur. J. Dev. Psychol., 1–14). In the present study we tested whether these changes in behavioural maturational level are associated with differences in brain responses to audiovisual speech across this age range. We measured high‐density event‐related potentials (ERPs) in response to videos of audiovisually matching and mismatched syllables /ba/ and /ga/, and subsequently examined visual scanning of the same stimuli with eye‐tracking. There were no clear age‐specific changes in ERPs, but the amplitude of audiovisual mismatch response (AVMMR) to the combination of visual /ba/ and auditory /ga/ was strongly negatively associated with looking time to the mouth in the same condition. These results have significant implications for our understanding of individual differences in neural signatures of audiovisual speech processing in infants, suggesting that they are not strictly related to chronological age but instead associated with the maturation of looking behaviour, and develop at individual rates in the second half of the first year of life.
The present study demonstrates the importance of combining electrophysiological (high‐density ERPs) and behavioural (eye‐tracking) measures in infancy research. The results have significant implications for understanding differences in brain responses rates of maturation in infants, demonstrating that individual differences in neural signatures of audiovisual integration are related to the behavioural level of maturity of audiovisual processing rather than to chronological age. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-W94ZL406-K ArticleID:EJN12317 istex:F74F0D40F1C4712E26EAC642608C0B7A6F97B3C8 Control study S1: Effects of task order on infant visual preferences (eye-tracking only). Control study S2: Auditory speech sounds only (ERP study). Control Study S3. Responses to audio-visual speech stimuli in adult participants (ERP study). Fig. S1. ERP responses to auditory only and audiovisual /ba/ and /ga/ syllables in infants. Fig. S2. Channel groups selected for statistical analyses. Fig. S3. Stimulus position and size in visual angle along with the positioning and size of the eyes and mouth Areas of Interest (AOIs) in eye-tracking study. Fig. S4. ERP responses to AV stimuli in NMP group of infants. Fig. S5. ERP responses to AV stimuli in MP group of infants. Fig. S6. ERPs in the younger and the older group of infants. Fig. S7. Results of study 3: Adult ERP responses to audiovisually congruent and incongruent stimuli. Eranda Foundation University of East London ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0953-816X 1460-9568 1460-9568 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ejn.12317 |