Contraceptive counselling experiences in Spain in the process of creating a web-based contraceptive decision support tool: a qualitative study

• Published in: Reproductive health Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 237
• Main Authors: Reyes-Martí, Laura, Rubio-Rico, Lourdes, Ortega-Sanz, Laura, Raigal-Aran, Laia, de la Flor-López, Miriam, Roca-Biosca, Alba, Valls-Fonayet, Francesc, Moharra-Francés, Montse, Escuriet-Peiro, Ramon, de Molina-Fernández, María Inmaculada
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 27-11-2021; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Birth control; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptives; Counseling; Decision support systems; Family planning services; Health aspects; Health counseling; Humans; Internet; Methods; Pregnancy; Qualitative Research; Reproductive health; Spain; Technology application; Womens health; Spain; Adherence; Qualitative research methods; Family planning; Shared decision support tools; Contraception; Contraceptive counselling
• ISSN: 1742-4755; 1742-4755
• DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01254-0

The choice of contraceptive method is a complex decision, and professionals should offer counselling based on the preferences, values and personal situation of the user(s). Some users are unsatisfied with the counselling received, which may, among other consequences, adversely affect method use adherence. In view of this situation, we propose exploring the experiences and needs of users and professionals for contraceptive counselling, in the context of creating a web-based contraceptive decision support tool.
Qualitative research was conducted through focus group discussions (64 users split into eight groups, and 19 professionals in two groups, in Tarragona, Spain) to explore the subjects' experiences and needs. The data were categorized and the categories were defined and classified based on the three-step protocol or framework for Quality on Contraceptive Counseling (QCC), created by experts, which reviews the quality of interactions between user and professional during the counselling process.
In counselling, users demand more information about the different methods, in an environment of erroneous knowledge and misinformation, which lead to false beliefs and myths in the population that are not contrasted by the professional in counselling. They complain that the method is imposed on them and that their views regarding the decision are not considered. Professionals are concerned that their lack of training leads to counselling directed towards the methods they know best. They acknowledge that a paternalistic paradigm persists in the healthcare they provide, and decision support tools may help to improve the situation.
Users feel unsatisfied and/or demand more information and a warmer, more caring approach. Professionals are reluctant to assume a process of shared decision-making. The use of a contraception DST website may solve some shortcomings in counselling detected in our environment.