Changing Conspiracy Beliefs through Rationality and Ridiculing

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 7; p. 1525
• Main Authors: Orosz, Gábor, Krekó, Péter, Paskuj, Benedek, Tóth-Király, István, Bőthe, Beáta, Roland-Lévy, Christine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media 13-10-2016; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Belief; conspiracy theory; Empathy; Humanities and Social Sciences; Psychology; rationality; ridiculing; ridiculing; empathy; conspiracy theory; rationality; belief
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525

Conspiracy theory (CT) beliefs can be harmful. How is it possible to reduce them effectively? Three reduction strategies were tested in an online experiment using general and well-known CT beliefs on a comprehensive randomly assigned Hungarian sample (
= 813): exposing rational counter CT arguments, ridiculing those who hold CT beliefs, and empathizing with the targets of CT beliefs. Several relevant individual differences were measured. Rational and ridiculing arguments were effective in reducing CT, whereas empathizing with the targets of CTs had no effect. Individual differences played no role in CT reduction, but the perceived intelligence and competence of the individual who conveyed the CT belief-reduction information contributed to the success of the CT belief reduction. Rational arguments targeting the link between the object of belief and its characteristics appear to be an effective tool in fighting conspiracy theory beliefs.