prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis

Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a multifaceted disease associated with exposure to various offending agents such as environmental and food allergens. The diagnosis of this condition is difficult because none of the typical signs are pathognomonic. Sets of criteria have been proposed but are mainly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary dermatology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 23 - 31
Main Authors: Favrot, Claude, Steffan, Jean, Seewald, Wolfgang, Picco, Federicca
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-02-2010
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a multifaceted disease associated with exposure to various offending agents such as environmental and food allergens. The diagnosis of this condition is difficult because none of the typical signs are pathognomonic. Sets of criteria have been proposed but are mainly used to include dogs in clinical studies. The goals of the present study were to characterize the clinical features and signs of a large population of dogs with CAD, to identify which of these characteristics could be different in food-induced atopic dermatitis (FIAD) and non-food-induced atopic dermatitis (NFIAD) and to develop criteria for the diagnosis of this condition. Using simulated annealing, selected criteria were tested on a large and geographically widespread population of pruritic dogs. The study first described the signalment, history and clinical features of a large population of CAD dogs, compared FIAD and NFIAD dogs and confirmed that both conditions are clinically indistinguishable. Correlations of numerous clinical features with the diagnosis of CAD are subsequently calculated, and two sets of criteria associated with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80% to 85% and from 79% to 85%, respectively, are proposed. It is finally demonstrated that these new sets of criteria provide better sensitivity and specificity, when compared to Willemse and Prélaud criteria. These criteria can be applied to both FIAD and NFIAD dogs.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00758.x
istex:5EE1216CE9B89548FAFD8CD142247F0096315AA4
ark:/67375/WNG-KBZM6B46-N
ArticleID:VDE758
The study was funded by Novartis Animal Health, Basel, Switzerland.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest has been declared.
Jean Steffan and Wolfgang Seewald are full time employees of Novartis Animal Health.
Source of Funding
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0959-4493
1365-3164
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00758.x