Competent in evidence-based practice (EBP): validation of a measurement tool that measures EBP self-efficacy and task value in speech-language therapy students
Background Worldwide speech–language therapy (SLT) students are educated in evidence‐based practice (EBP). For students to use EBP in their future day‐to‐day clinical practice, they must value EBP as positive and must feel confident in using it. For curricula developers it is therefore important to...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of language & communication disorders Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 453 - 457 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-07-2013
Wiley-Blackwell Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Worldwide speech–language therapy (SLT) students are educated in evidence‐based practice (EBP). For students to use EBP in their future day‐to‐day clinical practice, they must value EBP as positive and must feel confident in using it. For curricula developers it is therefore important to know the impact their teaching has on these aspects of students’ motivational beliefs.
Aims
To develop and validate a measurement tool to assess EBP task value and self‐efficacy in SLT students.
Methods & Procedures
A 20‐item questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and an additional group interview with speech–language therapists. Face validity of the questionnaire was established using a Delphi panel consisting of six EBP lecturers. Dutch bachelor SLT students (n = 149) with a different level of EBP knowledge and skills filled in the newly developed questionnaire. Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and internal validity using a principal component analysis (PCA). Construct validity was assessed by comparing the bachelor SLT student scores with a group of m students (n = 15) who were highly experienced in EBP.
Outcomes & Results
The PCA showed that the questionnaire consists of two components, representing EBP task value and self‐efficacy, both with good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.83 and 0.79, respectively). The hypothesis that master's students would score significantly higher on both components than bachelor SLT students was met.
Conclusions & Implications
The study provides evidence on the internal consistency and construct validity of this questionnaire to evaluate EBP task value and self‐efficacy in SLT students. As is common with new measures, more research is needed to evaluate further its psychometric properties. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:0D233B08BA0FB9E075B7BC866B5EADA9805C8251 ark:/67375/WNG-62QS6F49-4 ArticleID:JLCD12015 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1368-2822 1460-6984 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1460-6984.12015 |