Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in periodontitis: an exploratory study using traditional targeted techniques and a next-generation sequencing
Aim To compare the results of two targeted techniques to an open‐ended technique in periodontitis patients, differentiated on the basis of smoking habit. Materials & Methods Thirty periodontitis patients (15 smokers and 15 non‐smokers) provided subgingival plaque samples for 16S rRNA gene amplic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 483 - 492 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-05-2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim
To compare the results of two targeted techniques to an open‐ended technique in periodontitis patients, differentiated on the basis of smoking habit.
Materials & Methods
Thirty periodontitis patients (15 smokers and 15 non‐smokers) provided subgingival plaque samples for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, culturing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Results
No differences were found in the composition of the subgingival microbiome between smokers and non‐smokers with culture and qPCR. With pyrosequencing, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) classified to genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella and Selenomonas were more abundant in smokers, while OTUs belonging to the genera Peptococcus and Capnocytophaga were more abundant in non‐smokers. Principal coordinate analysis identified two clusters; one was composed mainly of smokers (80%) and revealed significantly lower taxonomic diversity, higher attachment loss and higher proportion of the genera Fusobacterium, Paludibacter and Desulfobubus.
Conclusion
In periodontitis, there is a difference in the composition of the subgingival microbiome between smokers and non‐smokers, as revealed by pyrosequencing. This difference was not identified by the targeted techniques. Low taxonomic diversity was associated with higher disease severity, especially in smokers. This supports the hypothesis of the ecological microbial–host interaction in the severity of periodontal disease. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-BJ50SL63-3 ArticleID:JCPE12087 DataSet S1. OTU table of subgingival plaque sample microbiomes; at the bottom row total number of reads/sample per subject is indicated. NS = non-smoker; S = smoker.DataSet S2. Subsampled OTU table of subgingival plaque sample microbiomes; at the bottom row total number of reads/sample per subject is indicated. All the samples have been randomly subsampled to 3200 reads/sample. Subject NS1 has been excluded from the statistical analysis because of the low number of reads/sample (563). NS = non-smoker; S = smoker.DataSet S3. Individual taxonomic diversity and severity of periodontal disease. Cluster distribution is made according to PCoA reported in Fig. . Clusters 0: outliers 1: high diversity 2: low diversity NS = non-smoker; S = smoker PCoA: Principal Coordinates Analysis OTUs: Operational Taxonomic Units AL: Attachment Level. istex:E6A535B65324B048FF8CEB6C4192F366ED441B6F This study was funded in part by the authors' institution and in part by a grant from the University of Amsterdam for the focal point “Oral infection and inflammation”. Conflict of interest and source of funding statement The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpe.12087 |