Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Food effect on abiraterone pharmacokinetics and safety on abiraterone acetate coadministration with low‐fat or high‐fat meals was examined in healthy subjects and metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Healthy subjects (n = 36) were randomized to abiraterone acetate (singl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 55; no. 12; pp. 1406 - 1414
Main Authors: Chi, Kim N., Spratlin, Jennifer, Kollmannsberger, Christian, North, Scott, Pankras, Catherine, Gonzalez, Martha, Bernard, Apexa, Stieltjes, Hans, Peng, Lixian, Jiao, James, Acharya, Milin, Kheoh, Thian, Griffin, Thomas W., Yu, Margaret K., Chien, Caly, Tran, Nam Phuong
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-12-2015
American College of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Food effect on abiraterone pharmacokinetics and safety on abiraterone acetate coadministration with low‐fat or high‐fat meals was examined in healthy subjects and metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Healthy subjects (n = 36) were randomized to abiraterone acetate (single dose, 1000 mg) + low‐fat meal, + high‐fat meal, and fasted state. mCRPC patients received repeated doses (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg + 5 mg prednisone twice daily; days 1–7) in a modified fasting state followed by abiraterone acetate plus prednisone within 0.5 hours post–low‐fat (n = 6) or high‐fat meal (n = 18; days 8–14). In healthy subjects, geometric mean (GM) abiraterone area under plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) increased ∼5‐ and ∼10‐fold, respectively, with low‐fat and high‐fat meals versus fasted state (GM [coefficient of variation], 1942 [48] and 4077 [37] ng · h/mL vs 421 [67] ng · h/mL, respectively). In mCRPC patients, abiraterone AUC was ∼2‐fold higher with a high‐fat meal and similar with a low‐fat meal versus modified fasting state (GM [coefficient of variation]: 1992 [34] vs 973 [58] ng · h/mL and 1264 [65] vs 1185 [90] ng · h/mL, respectively). Adverse events (all grade ≤ 3) were similar, with high‐fat/low‐fat meals or fasted/modified fasting state. Short‐term dosing with food did not alter abiraterone acetate safety.
Bibliography:The authors acknowledge the contributions of Christian Lopez toward protocol design and execution during study 1.Writing assistance was provided by Hajira Koeller, PhD, of PAREXEL and was funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC.
ark:/67375/WNG-Q9V9HQSP-7
ArticleID:JCPH564
istex:24E644126CEB0F447AEEA89A31D0B1405FFCD751
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-2700
1552-4604
DOI:10.1002/jcph.564