La Vía Campesina: the birth and evolution of a transnational social movement

• Published in: The Journal of peasant studies Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 149 - 175
• Main Authors: Martínez-Torres, María Elena, Rosset, Peter M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Routledge 01-01-2010; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Borders; Corporations; Culture; Food policy; Food safety; food sovereignty; Gender studies; History; Identity; Internationalism; La Vía Campesina; Latin America; Leadership; peasant movement; Peasant movements; Peasants; Poor; Rural Areas; Social activism; Social Movements; Sovereignty; Transnationalism; Via Campesina
• ISSN: 0306-6150; 1743-9361
• DOI: 10.1080/03066150903498804

The origin and evolution of the transnational peasant movement La Vía Campesina is analysed through five evolutionary stages. In the 1980s the withdrawal of the state from rural areas simultaneously weakened corporativist and clientelist control over rural organisations, even as conditions worsened in the countryside. This gave rise to a new generation of more autonomous peasant organisations, who saw the origins of their similar problems as largely coming from beyond the national borders of weakened nation-states. A transnational social movement defending peasant life, La Vía Campesina emerged out of these autonomous organisations, first in Latin America, and then at a global scale, during the 1980s and early 1990s (phase 1). Subsequent stages saw leaders of peasant organisations take their place at the table in international debates (1992-1999, phase 2), muscling aside other actors who sought to speak on their behalf; take on a leadership role in global struggles (2000-2003, phase 3); and engage in internal strengthening (2004-2008, phase 4). More recently (late 2008-present, phase 5) the movement has taken on gender issues more squarely and defined itself more clearly in opposition to transnational corporations. Particular emphasis is given to La Vía Campesina's fight to gain legitimacy for the food sovereignty paradigm, to its internal structure, and to the ways in which the (re)construction of a shared peasant identity is a key glue that holds the struggle together despite widely different internal cultures, creating a true peasant internationalism.