Antidepressants: general practitioners' opinions and clinical practice
Objective: To describe and compare general practitioners’ (GPs) opinions on antidepressant drugs and their prescriptions to depressed patients. Method: Between November 2000 and July 2001 a representative sample of French GPs was asked their opinion of the 15 most prescribed antidepressants, and t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol. 113; no. 6; pp. 460 - 467 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-06-2006
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective: To describe and compare general practitioners’ (GPs) opinions on antidepressant drugs and their prescriptions to depressed patients.
Method: Between November 2000 and July 2001 a representative sample of French GPs was asked their opinion of the 15 most prescribed antidepressants, and then to describe the treatments of the current depressive episode of four depressive patients each, their changes and the reasons thereof.
Results: One hundred and eighty‐one GPs and 778 patients participated. The best‐ranked antidepressants by the GPs were paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline and clomipramine for efficacy, and paroxetine, tianeptine, sertraline and fluoxetine for tolerability. In patients, the drugs most often prescribed were fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline. Those least often stopped for intolerance were moclobemide (0%), dosulepine (0%), venlafaxine (4.5%) and citalopram (5.0%), and maprotiline (0%), citalopram (1.7%) and venlafaxine (2.3%) for lack of efficacy. The best predictor for prescription of antidepressants was the GPs’ overall ranking, itself depending on opinions of the tolerability and efficacy of the drug. However, opinions of tolerability and efficacy were not related to the rates of treatment discontinuation for intolerability or inefficacy.
Conclusion: Prescriber opinion does not seem related to actual product performance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-BGFNWG4Q-X istex:B1235570500FFDABFB11755575D724E17382A263 ArticleID:ACPS793 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0001-690X 1600-0447 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00793.x |