Early Detection to Prevent Foot Ulceration among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patient: A Multi-Intervention Review

Foot ulceration is one of the biggest complications experienced by type 2 diabetes patients. The severity and prevention of new wounds can be overcome through early detection interventions. This systematic review aims to explain and provide a comparison of various interventions that have been develo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Public Health Research Vol. 11; no. 2
Main Authors: Rismayanti, I Dewa Ayu, Nursalam, Farida, Virgianti Nur, Dewi, Ni Wayan Suniya, Utami, Resti, Aris, Arifal, Agustini, Ni Luh Putu Inca Buntari
Format: Book Review Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 22-03-2022
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
SAGE Publishing
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Foot ulceration is one of the biggest complications experienced by type 2 diabetes patients. The severity and prevention of new wounds can be overcome through early detection interventions. This systematic review aims to explain and provide a comparison of various interventions that have been developed to prevent the occurrence of Diabetes Foot Ulcers (DFU). We searched Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL, SAGE, and ProQuest for English, experimental studies, published between 2016-2021 that tested early detection for preventing diabetic foot ulcers in diabetic patients. The Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines were used to assess eligibility, and PRISMA quality and a checklist to guide this review. 25 studies were obtained that matched the specified inclusion criteria. The entire article has an experimental study design. Majority of respondents were type 2 diabetes patients who have not experienced ulceration. Based on the results of the review, there were 3 main types of interventions used in the early detection of DFU. The types of intervention used are 1) conventional intervention/physical assessment, 2) 3D thermal camera assessment system, and 3) DFU screening instrument. The three types of interventions have advantages and disadvantages, so their use needs to be adjusted to the conditions and needs of the patient. the development of DFU risk early detection intervention needs to be developed. Integration with modern technology can also be done to increase the accuracy of the results and the ease of examination procedures.
Bibliography:Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests, and all authors confirm accuracy.
Informed consent: The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Contributions: All the authors contributed to the conduct and design of the study and were involved in data analysis, writing the manuscript, and approving the final manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
ISSN:2279-9036
2279-9028
2279-9036
DOI:10.4081/jphr.2022.2752