Nonliteral understanding of number words
One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 33; pp. 12002 - 12007 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
19-08-2014
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number words, in particular hyperbole (interpreting unlikely numbers as exaggerated and conveying affect) and pragmatic halo (interpreting round numbers imprecisely). We provide a computational model of number interpretation as social inference regarding the communicative goal, meaning, and affective subtext of an utterance. We show that our model predicts humans’ interpretation of number words with high accuracy. Our model is the first to our knowledge to incorporate principles of communication and empirically measured background knowledge to quantitatively predict hyperbolic and pragmatic halo effects in number interpretation. This modeling framework provides a unified approach to nonliteral language understanding more generally. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407479111 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Barbara H. Partee, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, and approved July 2, 2014 (received for review April 25, 2014) Author contributions: J.T.K., J.Y.W., L.B., and N.D.G. designed research; J.T.K., J.Y.W., and L.B. performed research; J.T.K. and J.Y.W. analyzed data; and J.T.K. and N.D.G. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1407479111 |