Nonliteral understanding of number words

One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 33; pp. 12002 - 12007
Main Authors: Kao, Justine T., Wu, Jean Y., Bergen, Leon, Goodman, Noah D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 19-08-2014
National Acad Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number words, in particular hyperbole (interpreting unlikely numbers as exaggerated and conveying affect) and pragmatic halo (interpreting round numbers imprecisely). We provide a computational model of number interpretation as social inference regarding the communicative goal, meaning, and affective subtext of an utterance. We show that our model predicts humans’ interpretation of number words with high accuracy. Our model is the first to our knowledge to incorporate principles of communication and empirically measured background knowledge to quantitatively predict hyperbolic and pragmatic halo effects in number interpretation. This modeling framework provides a unified approach to nonliteral language understanding more generally.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407479111
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Barbara H. Partee, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, and approved July 2, 2014 (received for review April 25, 2014)
Author contributions: J.T.K., J.Y.W., L.B., and N.D.G. designed research; J.T.K., J.Y.W., and L.B. performed research; J.T.K. and J.Y.W. analyzed data; and J.T.K. and N.D.G. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1407479111