The IMPACT framework and implementation for accessible in silico clinical phenotyping in the digital era

Clinical phenotyping is often a foundational requirement for obtaining datasets necessary for the development of digital health applications. Traditionally done via manual abstraction, this task is often a bottleneck in development due to time and cost requirements, therefore raising significant int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NPJ digital medicine Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 132
Main Authors: Wen, Andrew, He, Huan, Fu, Sunyang, Liu, Sijia, Miller, Kurt, Wang, Liwei, Roberts, Kirk E., Bedrick, Steven D., Hersh, William R., Liu, Hongfang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 21-07-2023
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clinical phenotyping is often a foundational requirement for obtaining datasets necessary for the development of digital health applications. Traditionally done via manual abstraction, this task is often a bottleneck in development due to time and cost requirements, therefore raising significant interest in accomplishing this task via in-silico means. Nevertheless, current in-silico phenotyping development tends to be focused on a single phenotyping task resulting in a dearth of reusable tools supporting cross-task generalizable in-silico phenotyping. In addition, in-silico phenotyping remains largely inaccessible for a substantial portion of potentially interested users. Here, we highlight the barriers to the usage of in-silico phenotyping and potential solutions in the form of a framework of several desiderata as observed during our implementation of such tasks. In addition, we introduce an example implementation of said framework as a software application, with a focus on ease of adoption, cross-task reusability, and facilitating the clinical phenotyping algorithm development process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2398-6352
2398-6352
DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00878-9