Provision of Safe Anesthesia in Magnetic Resonance Environments: Degree of Compliance with International Guidelines in Saudi Arabia

• Published in: Healthcare (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 18; p. 2508
• Main Authors: Alshuhri, Mohammed S, Alkhateeb, Bader A, Alomair, Othman I, Alghamdi, Sami A, Madkhali, Yahia A, Altamimi, Abdulrahman M, Alashban, Yazeed I, Alotaibi, Meshal M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-09-2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Care and treatment; Compliance; Complications and side effects; Contrast media; Evaluation; General anesthesia; Hospitals; International organizations; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical personnel; Patient outcomes; Patient safety; Patients; Pediatrics; Response rates; safe anesthesia; Safety and security measures; Safety regulations; Saudi Arabia; Surveys; Saudi Arabia
• ISSN: 2227-9032; 2227-9032
• DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182508

Background: The lack of local guidelines and regulations for the administration of anesthesia in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) units presents a potential risk to patient safety in Saudi Arabia. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the extent to which hospitals in Saudi Arabia follow international guidelines and recommendations for the safe and effective administration of anesthesia in an MRI environment. Methods: This study used a questionnaire that was distributed to 31 medical facilities in Saudi Arabia that provided anesthesia in MRI units. Results: The findings of the study revealed that the mean compliance with the 17 guidelines across the 31 sites was 77%; 5 of the 31 sites (16.1%) had a compliance rate of less than 50% with the recommended guidelines. Only 19.4% of the institutes provided general safety education. Communication breakdowns between anesthesia providers and MRI teams were reported. Conclusions: To conclude, this survey highlights the status of anesthesia standards in Saudi Arabian MRI units and emphasizes areas that require better adherence to international guidelines. The results call for targeted interventions, including the formulation of specific national anesthesia guidelines for MRI settings. Communication breakdowns between anesthesia providers and MRI teams were reported at a rate of 83.9% during the administration of a gadolinium contrast agent. There were additional breakdowns, particularly for high-risk patients with implants, such as impaired respirators (74.2%), thus requiring further investigation due to potential safety incidents during MRI procedures. While considering the limitations of this study, such as potential biases and the low response rate, it provides a valuable foundation for refining protocols and promoting standardized practices in Saudi Arabian healthcare.