Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 10536
• Main Authors: Auer, Kerstin E., Primus, Jasmin, Istel, Sonja, Dahlhoff, Maik, Rülicke, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 29-06-2023; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/158/856; 631/181/2470; Animals; Cell Communication; Embryo Implantation; Embryo transfer; Female; Females; Genetic diversity; Genotypes; Haplotypes; Heterozygosity; Humanities and Social Sciences; Inbreeding; Male; Males; Maternal behavior; Mating behavior; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred CBA; multidisciplinary; Offspring; Reproduction - genetics; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sex ratio; Survival; Weaning
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37547-6

Maternal investment can affect the survival and development of offspring. Here we experimentally investigated in mice, whether females alter implantation rates and pup survival after embryo transfer depending on the genetic similarity with their vasectomised mating partner. We selected the MHC genotype and genetic background of males and paired females either with males that shared the same MHC haplotype and genetic background (CBA/J inbred males, isogenic group), that shared half of the MHC haplotype and genetic background (B6CBAF1 hybrid males, semi-isogenic group), or that had a different MHC haplotype and genetic background (C57BL/6N inbred males, allogenic group). We performed 304 pairings, resulting in 81 vaginal plugs, which confirmed mating. Plug rates were significantly higher in the semi-isogenic group (36.9%) compared to the isogenic group (19.5%), but not the allogenic group (26%). We found no difference in the number of implantation sites, the number of born or surviving pups until weaning, or litter weight or sex ratio between groups. Even though we found a mating bias, we found no difference in maternal investment under laboratory conditions. At least under pathogen-free conditions our study does not provide any evidence for differential maternal investment when females could increase offspring genetic diversity or heterozygosity.