Furosemide Terminates Limbic Status Epilepticus in Freely Moving Rats

Purpose: To evaluate the anticonvulsant properties of furosemide and to determine sedative side effects compared with pentobarbital and diuretic side effects compared with saline‐treated controls in an experimental model of limbic status epilepticus. Methods: Self‐sustaining status epilepticus was i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) Vol. 44; no. 9; pp. 1141 - 1144
Main Authors: Holtkamp, Martin, Matzen, Julia, Buchheim, Katharina, Walker, Matthew C., Meierkord, Hartmut
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , U.S.A Blackwell Science Inc 01-09-2003
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: To evaluate the anticonvulsant properties of furosemide and to determine sedative side effects compared with pentobarbital and diuretic side effects compared with saline‐treated controls in an experimental model of limbic status epilepticus. Methods: Self‐sustaining status epilepticus was induced in rats by continuous electrical stimulation of the perforant path. Five minutes after the end of the stimulation, animals were given 100 mg/kg furosemide, 30 mg/kg pentobarbital, or an equal amount of saline, intraperitoneally. After administration of the substance, animals were monitored clinically and electrographically for 3 h regarding status epilepticus, level of sedation, and diuresis. Results: In seven of 10 animals, furosemide terminated status epilepticus after 68 ± 26 min, whereas pentobarbital was successful in all animals after 5 ± 0.8 min. In contrast to pentobarbital, sedation did not occur with furosemide. Weight loss after furosemide was 10.2 ± 1.7% compared with 6.5 ± 1.1% in animals given saline (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results suggest that furosemide may serve as an alternative or additional agent for refractory complex partial status epilepticus in patients in whom common anesthetics are not justifiable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-9580
1528-1167
DOI:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.14003.x